Breaking news

The European Union’s New €3 Customs Charge On Small Parcels: What Shoppers And Sellers Need To Know

The European Union is moving to close one of the most controversial loopholes in cross-border e-commerce. From July 1, the bloc will introduce a fixed €3 customs duty on low-value parcels imported from outside the EU, targeting the growing volume of online purchases from platforms such as Shein, Temu and AliExpress.

A Temporary Measure Targeting A Structural Problem

Under the new rules, parcels valued at less than €150 will be subject to the €3 charge. Until now, such shipments were exempt from customs duties under the EU’s de minimis threshold. Although they were still subject to VAT and customs declarations, they entered the bloc duty-free.

Brussels argues that the system has become increasingly difficult to manage, putting European retailers at a competitive disadvantage while making it harder for customs authorities to enforce safety, environmental and consumer protection rules across billions of small imports.

How The €3 Duty Will Work

Rather than applying once per parcel, the charge will be based on customs classifications.

For example, a package containing a T-shirt and a pair of shoes would incur two separate €3 charges because they fall under different product categories. By contrast, several identical T-shirts shipped in the same parcel would normally attract a single €3 charge.

Designed as an interim solution, the measure is expected to remain in force from July 1, 2026, until July 1, 2028, although officials have left open the possibility of an extension if necessary.

Once the EU’s e-commerce customs data hub becomes operational, the temporary measure is expected to be replaced by the bloc’s standard customs tariffs.

Why Brussels Is Acting Now

Brussels introduced the measure following a sharp increase in low-value imports. EU data show that 4.6 billion low-value parcels entered the bloc in 2024, while almost 5.9 billion individual items were shipped directly from third countries to EU consumers in 2025.

Most of that trade is concentrated in China. According to EU figures, 91% of low-value shipments arriving in 2024 originated there, highlighting the growing influence of Asian e-commerce platforms on the European market.

Beyond competition concerns, EU institutions argue that the sheer volume of small parcels makes it increasingly difficult for customs and market surveillance authorities to verify compliance with European safety, environmental and consumer protection rules.

Particular scrutiny has focused on toys, cosmetics, electronics, food supplements and personal protective equipment sold directly to consumers through non-EU platforms.

Targeted inspections carried out across the EU in 2025 found that more than 60% of products checked in those categories failed to comply with EU standards because of issues such as missing labels, prohibited ingredients or inadequate safety documentation, according to the European Commission.

The Wider Policy Goal: Fairness, Safety And Enforcement

According to the Council of the European Union, the new measure is intended to address “unfair competition for EU sellers, health and safety risks for consumers, high levels of fraud and environmental concerns.”

More broadly, the initiative reflects a shift in Brussels’ approach. Rather than treating low-value e-commerce imports as a niche customs issue, policymakers increasingly view them as a broader challenge for market integrity, consumer protection and regulatory enforcement.

Who Pays The Charge?

Although the €3 duty applies to businesses, consumers could ultimately bear the cost if online platforms pass it on through higher prices, delivery fees or other charges.

According to the European Commission, the duty is not a tax on consumers. Legal responsibility rests with the declarant, such as the seller, importer, IOSS holder or their representative, while consumers are expected to become liable only in limited circumstances.

A separate handling fee is also being considered as part of the wider customs reform. The final amount is expected to be agreed before member states begin applying it, no later than November 1, 2026.

What It Means For Shoppers In Cyprus And Across The EU

For shoppers in Cyprus and elsewhere in the EU, the most noticeable impact will be on low-cost purchases from non-EU platforms. Small orders may become slightly more expensive, while parcels containing different categories of products could incur multiple €3 charges.

Timing will also be important. As with other imports from third countries, customs duties are generally determined when goods enter the EU customs system and are cleared, rather than when the order is placed.

A similar principle already applies to larger imports, including passenger vehicles imported into Cyprus from outside the EU. Customs charges arise when the vehicle enters the country and is cleared, with passenger cars generally subject to a 10% import duty and 19% VAT.

Simply placing an order before July 1 may therefore not be enough to avoid the charge if the parcel arrives and is cleared after the new rules take effect. The purchase date alone does not determine whether the duty applies.

For online shoppers, the practical assumption is straightforward: if a parcel from a non-EU country is released through EU customs on or after July 1, the new €3 charge may apply, even if it was ordered earlier.

How Platforms May Respond

Online retailers may seek to reduce the impact by importing goods into European warehouses in bulk before distributing them to customers. In that case, products would no longer enter the EU as individual low-value parcels, although they would still be subject to the standard customs procedures and duties that apply to larger commercial shipments.

One of the policy’s objectives is to encourage larger, more traceable consignments. That would allow customs authorities to inspect imports more efficiently instead of processing millions of individual parcels arriving through airports and ports across the bloc.

For the EU, the measure is intended to strengthen enforcement as much as raise revenue, giving customs authorities greater oversight of a system that has become increasingly difficult to manage.

Cyprus Home Solar Enters A New Era: What Net Billing, Curtailments And Storage Mean For Households

Residential photovoltaic systems in Cyprus are entering a new phase. The transition from net metering to net billing, growing curtailments of renewable generation, the increasing role of battery storage, changes to subsidy schemes and the launch of the competitive electricity market are reshaping the economics of rooftop solar for thousands of households.

Those changes have direct implications for both existing and prospective solar owners. They affect the financial performance of residential systems while raising practical questions about self-consumption, electricity exports and whether investing in battery storage now makes economic sense.

Drawing on publicly available information and updates from the relevant energy authorities, the following overview outlines the most important developments and answers some of the questions most frequently raised by residential consumers.

From Net Metering To Net Billing

For years, net metering has been the standard model for residential photovoltaic systems in Cyprus. Publicly available data indicate that around 100,000 households currently operate under the scheme, with a combined installed capacity of approximately 450 MW, representing about 43% of the country’s total solar capacity.

From 1 January 2026, however, new residential solar installations will no longer qualify for net metering and will instead be connected under the net billing framework. The change fundamentally alters how electricity is valued, making it increasingly important for prospective investors to reassess the economics of a new installation.

Why The Difference Matters

The key difference between the two systems lies in how imported and exported electricity is settled.

Under net metering, electricity imported from and exported to the grid is offset on a bi-monthly basis using energy quantities. Any surplus generation is carried forward to the next settlement period, while electricity shortfalls are billed at the applicable retail tariff. Depending on the contract, accumulated surpluses are generally reset without compensation after three years.

Net billing works differently. Settlement is based on the monetary value of electricity rather than the amount of energy generated. Power exported to the grid is compensated at the wholesale price, while electricity imported from the grid is charged at the retail tariff. In practice, households sell electricity at a lower price than they pay to buy it back, making self-consumption significantly more valuable than under the previous system.

Why Storage Is Becoming More Important

Battery storage increases self-consumption by storing surplus solar energy for use later in the day, when photovoltaic panels are no longer generating electricity. That makes storage considerably more valuable under net billing, where maximising on-site consumption has a greater impact on overall savings.

Even so, installing batteries remains an investment decision that depends on installation costs, system size and future technology prices. For many households, however, battery storage is evolving from an optional upgrade into an increasingly important tool for protecting long-term returns.

What Happens To Existing Net Metering Contracts

Existing net metering agreements remain valid until they expire, typically after 15 years, and are not affected by the rules governing new installations.

Once those agreements come to an end, homeowners will be able to move to net billing or consider other options available under the competitive electricity market.

What Happens To Accumulated Surpluses

Most net metering agreements provide for accumulated energy surpluses to be reset after one or three years, depending on the terms of the contract. Some older agreements still provide compensation for unused surpluses, although such arrangements have become increasingly uncommon.

At the beginning of 2026, EPC Supply decided, under the framework of the 2024 renewable energy grant scheme, that accumulated surpluses would be reset without compensation. The company also decided that the reset would recur every three years for all affected contracts.

The decision prompted strong reactions from residential solar owners, leading to parliamentary debate and a presidential referral. The matter is now awaiting a final decision by the Council of Ministers.

Are New Support Schemes Available

The policy shift is also reflected in changes to government support programmes. The popular Fotovoltaika Gia Olous scheme ended on 31 December 2025, and no replacement grant programme is currently available.

A new scheme, Anavathmizo – Exoikonomo, is expected to launch in September 2026 with a budget of €20 million. It will focus on residential energy upgrades and is expected to support the installation of photovoltaic systems combined with battery storage. The approach is consistent with the European Union’s “energy efficiency first” principle, which prioritises reducing energy consumption before expanding generation capacity.

Residential Solar And The Competitive Electricity Market

Another significant change is the opportunity for residential solar owners to participate in the competitive electricity market. Under the current regulatory framework, households that are not participating in subsidy schemes may monetise surplus electricity through agreements with licensed electricity suppliers or aggregation entities operating in the market.

That creates new commercial opportunities, but it also places greater emphasis on understanding technical limitations, contractual arrangements and market pricing. As the market evolves, informed decision-making is becoming increasingly important.

Why Curtailments Happen

Curtailments remain one of the most frequently discussed issues among residential solar owners. Every electricity system must continuously balance generation with demand to maintain grid stability.

When solar production is high but electricity demand is low, the grid can experience oversupply conditions that threaten the security of supply. In those circumstances, the Cyprus Transmission System Operator may instruct the Distribution System Operator (EAC) to temporarily reduce photovoltaic generation.

Curtailments follow a specific order of priority. Large-scale solar parks are limited first, followed, where necessary, by newer residential installations. Older household systems, which account for roughly half of all residential photovoltaic installations, were connected without ripple-control equipment and are therefore not subject to curtailment.

Can Curtailments Be Avoided

One option is to operate a photovoltaic system in zero-export mode, either temporarily or permanently.

Under this configuration, the electricity generated is consumed within the property rather than exported to the grid, unless temporary exports are permitted. Whether this improves the financial outcome depends on several factors, including household consumption patterns, system size and the presence of battery storage.

Operating completely off-grid is possible only with approval from the relevant authorities and is generally limited to remote locations where a grid connection is impractical. Such systems require a technical study by a qualified electrical engineer and typically combine photovoltaic panels with battery storage. A backup diesel generator is usually required to ensure a reliable power supply.

Homeowners planning to expand or modify an existing photovoltaic installation must also obtain the necessary approvals from EAC Supply. Depending on the scope of the changes, a revised agreement or the installation of ripple-control equipment may be required.

A Market Reset For Homeowners

Residential solar in Cyprus is entering a new operating environment. Net billing, curtailments, battery storage, changes to surplus treatment and the gradual liberalisation of the electricity market are reshaping the economics of rooftop photovoltaic systems.

For households considering a new installation, understanding self-consumption, battery economics and future electricity pricing will become increasingly important. Existing system owners, meanwhile, will need to assess how evolving market rules may affect their current agreements and long-term returns.

Aretilaw firm
Uol
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter