Breaking news

House Oversight Committee Calls Bill Gates To Testify On Epstein Association

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates is slated to appear before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee this Wednesday to address questions regarding his contentious association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The interview marks one of the most high-profile examinations of Epstein’s network and its far-reaching connections within elite circles.

Committee Inquiries and Preparations

The House committee, which has been vigorously probing Epstein’s connections to influential figures, is leaving no stone unturned. Following the questioning of Epstein’s former long-time executive assistant, Lesley Groff, the panel chair, Rep. James Comer, asserted that Gates is prepared to answer any query thrown his way. “Anything’s on the table,” Comer said, emphasizing the committee’s commitment to uncovering the full extent of the network.

Context Of Gates’ Association With Epstein

Reports indicate that Gates’ relationship with Epstein began in 2011, as noted by The Wall Street Journal. This association drew renewed attention following the release of additional documents by the Department of Justice and Congress in late 2025. Although Gates has not been implicated in any illegal activities connected to Epstein, he has acknowledged that the association was a significant misstep. At a Gates Foundation town hall in February, he publicly apologized for engaging with Epstein and for exposing foundation executives to meetings with him.

Apology And Ongoing Review

During that session, Gates remarked, “I did nothing illicit. I saw nothing illicit,” while also emphasizing his regret over the decision to meet Epstein. The Gates Foundation has since commissioned an external review of its historical ties to Epstein, with an expected update to the board and management this summer.

Perspectives From Industry Leaders

In an interesting aside, longtime friend Warren Buffett, also Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, disclosed during an interview with Becky Quick that he had refrained from contacting Gates after the unveiling of documents related to Epstein. Buffett was unequivocal in his criticism of Epstein, describing him as a con artist who exploited human weaknesses for personal gain.

This development adds another layer to the ongoing discourse on accountability and transparency among the world’s wealthiest individuals. As the House committee prepares for further testimony, the scrutiny of influential networks continues to intensify.


Central Bank Study: Cyprus Tax Reform Favors Higher-Income Households

Cyprus’s 2026 personal income tax reform is expected to deliver its biggest financial gains to upper-middle-income and high-income households, according to a new working paper by the Central Bank of Cyprus (CBC).

The study, Assessing the Distributional and Fiscal Impacts of Cyprus’s Personal Income Tax Reform, by economists Aris Avgousti, Charalambos Michael and Georgiana Photiadou, examines how the proposed tax changes could affect household incomes, government finances and the broader economy.

Higher Earners Benefit Most

The paper concludes that the reform will increase average disposable income and reduce personal income tax liabilities, but the gains will be unevenly distributed across income groups.

Although the Central Bank does not set tax policy, the researchers argue that tax reforms can influence monetary policy by changing household spending, saving and borrowing behaviour.

“By reallocating disposable income across households with different marginal propensities to consume, different savings behaviour and different exposure to interest rate movements, the reform may influence the strength and composition of monetary policy transmission,”

the paper said.

How The Reform Was Assessed

The analysis used EUROMOD tax-benefit microsimulations alongside confidential household data from the EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) and the Household Budget Survey.

It assessed changes to income tax brackets, a new income-dependent allowance for dependent children and university students, and an income-dependent allowance for mortgage interest or rental expenses linked to primary residences. A proposed tax incentive for green capital expenditure was excluded because of data limitations.

Limited Relief For Lower-Income Households

Many lower-income households are expected to see little or no direct benefit because their taxable income was already below the previous threshold.

In 2022, 43% of taxpayers reported taxable income below the pre-reform threshold of €19,500. Households in the lowest income decile are projected to gain an average of just €5 per year, compared with €1,057 for those in the highest decile.

The largest gains are concentrated among upper-middle-income and high-income households, while middle-income groups receive more modest benefits. As a share of disposable income, gains peak at 2.9% in the ninth income decile before easing to 2% in the highest decile.

Fiscal Cost And Trade-Offs

The researchers estimate the reform will reduce government revenue by around €240 million annually, broadly in line with official projections, while reducing the number of taxpayers with positive personal income tax liabilities by around 22%.

Although the paper says the fiscal cost appears manageable given Cyprus’s budget position, it argues that alternative approaches could have reduced the concentration of benefits among higher-income households while preserving more fiscal space for social cohesion measures and productivity-enhancing investment.

Modest Economic Impact

The reform is expected to support private consumption and modestly increase consumption tax revenues, producing a limited boost to economic growth. However, the impact is likely to be constrained because a significant share of additional spending will be absorbed by imports rather than domestic production.

The paper also notes that Cyprus’s fiscal surpluses provide an opportunity to invest in productivity, public services and the green and digital transition.

Relief Comes With Distributional Trade-Offs

The authors conclude that while the reform increases disposable income and lowers personal income tax liabilities, it does little to improve income distribution.

“Achieving meaningful distributional improvements would likely require strengthening the social safety net and deploying more targeted fiscal support,”

the researchers said.

They add that higher disposable incomes should leave households better off overall, while changes in income distribution could also affect borrowing, housing demand and the transmission of monetary policy.

eCredo
Aretilaw firm
Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter