Breaking news

Cyprus Expands International Outreach To Attract Returning Professionals

The Cypriot government will expand its outreach initiatives in May to attract highly skilled professionals under the national Minds In Cyprus initiative. The move follows parliamentary approval of a legislative framework that broadens tax incentives for returning expatriates. Government outreach will target international locations, including Athens, Thessaloniki, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

International Outreach And Strategic Engagement

Starting in mid-May, a series of job fairs will support the repatriation effort. The events are designed to connect employers with candidates through direct interaction, including CV exchange and on-site interviews. The format provides immediate access to job opportunities and enables employers to engage with candidates currently working abroad.

The Mechanism Behind Minds In Cyprus

The initiative builds on a 2024 event in England, which attracted more than 750 Cypriot professionals working abroad. The online platform Minds In Cyprus, along with the Opportunities For Talent program of the Ministry of Labor, has attracted interest from 670 expatriates.

Candidates register by submitting personal, academic, and professional information, while employers list open roles. Current listings include 72 private-sector positions and seven public-sector roles, with 371 additional vacancies already advertised.

Data-Driven Matching And Ongoing Support

The Ministry of Labor’s department matches candidate qualifications with employer requirements. Data show 233 matches between candidates and job openings, although limited feedback from participants restricts full evaluation of outcomes. Advisors from the European Employment Services (EURES) support candidates by guiding employment and relocation.

Enhanced Action Plan For A New Era

The updated Action Plan includes measures aimed at accelerating repatriation and integration:

  • Tax incentives have been expanded, with the exemption rate set at 25% and the cap increased from €8,550 to €25,000. The required period abroad has been reduced from 15 to seven years after completing higher education.
  • Citizenship procedures for spouses and partners are being streamlined through the Population and Electoral Archive.
  • Access to state-supported housing is being simplified by removing the two-year permanent residence requirement.
  • Registration procedures for healthcare professionals are being accelerated, alongside recognition of foreign qualifications.
  • Greek language courses are offered with state support to assist integration.
  • Subsidies for in-house training and tuition support for children in private education are included.

The measures define the government’s framework for attracting and integrating skilled professionals into the domestic labor market.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter