Breaking news

Cyprus Considers Extending Basic Payment Account Rules To Small Businesses

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

March 13, 2026

Legislative Proposals Set For Review

Cypriot lawmakers are preparing to examine proposals that would extend the framework of basic payment accounts to very small businesses. The initiative is expected to be brought before the parliamentary plenary in the coming period. However, the proposals have drawn strong opposition from several institutions, including the finance ministry, the Central Bank of Cyprus (CBC) and commercial banks. The discussion in the House Commerce Committee follows nearly three years of review and consultations.

In-Depth Overview Of The Proposals

The first legislative proposal seeks to redefine the term “consumer” so that very small businesses would fall within the scope of basic payment account regulations. It also aims to improve transparency and comparability of bank charges linked to these accounts.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

The second proposal would prevent banks from rejecting an application for a basic payment account simply because the applicant already holds an account with another credit institution. Supporters argue that this change would ensure broader and more equal access to essential banking services.

Historical Context And Regulatory Debates

During the committee session, MP Costas explained that the proposal to expand the definition of “consumer” dates back to amendments discussed in 2020 following the adoption of a relevant European directive. At the time, the proposal was postponed due to concerns that Cyprus could face legal complications at the European level if the directive was not fully transposed into national law. According to Costas and fellow MPs Giannakis Gavriel and Andreas Pasiourtidis, the issue has not been incorporated into a government bill.

Mixed Reactions From Key Stakeholders

Several public authorities have raised concerns about the proposed changes. Avgi Chrysostomou-Lapathiotis, representing the finance ministry, argued that the new provisions could impose additional obligations on banks that are already regulated under EU harmonisation legislation. The consumer protection service also noted that a broader legislative review of the framework remains pending.

A representative of the Central Bank of Cyprus, Artemis Nicolaou, questioned whether the changes are necessary. According to the CBC, the current volume of complaints does not justify expanding supervisory responsibilities without prior consultation with the European Central Bank.

Industry Concerns Over Business Risk Management

The banking sector has also expressed reservations about the proposals. Michalis Kronides, Senior Director of the Cyprus Banks Association, warned that the changes could limit banks’ ability to assess and manage client risk. He argued that financial institutions could be required to serve higher-risk businesses, including companies operating in sectors such as cryptocurrency.

Under the current framework, basic payment accounts are intended to cover routine banking services such as deposits, withdrawals, direct debits, card payments, online transactions and credit transfers. The proposed reforms, therefore, raise broader questions about how to balance financial access with risk management in the banking system.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.