Breaking news

Samsung Unveils Galaxy S26 Series With New Privacy Features And AI Upgrades

Galaxy S26 Smartphones

At its Galaxy Unpacked event in San Francisco, Samsung introduced the Galaxy S26 lineup, which includes the Galaxy S26 Ultra, S26 Plus, and S26. The new devices build on last year’s models with hardware upgrades, stronger AI integration, and expanded privacy features.

The flagship Galaxy S26 Ultra runs on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor and features a 6.9-inch QHD+ display. It includes a 5,000 mAh battery with support for fast charging, reaching up to 75% in around 30 minutes with a 60W charger. Samsung also continues to position the device as a productivity-focused model with integrated S-Pen support.

Camera updates include a 200-megapixel wide lens and a 50-megapixel telephoto lens with improved apertures aimed at enhancing low-light performance. In selected markets, the Galaxy S26 and S26 Plus are powered by Samsung’s Exynos 2600 processor, with pricing slightly higher than the previous generation.

Enhanced Privacy Display Technology

One of the key additions is an updated privacy display system available on the S26 Ultra. The feature is designed to reduce screen visibility for nearby onlookers, allowing users to hide sensitive content such as notifications or password fields. Users can apply privacy settings on an app-by-app basis, while a dedicated maximum privacy mode adjusts brightness and display behavior to further limit side viewing. The feature reflects growing demand for stronger privacy controls on mobile devices.

Gemini’s Agentic Transformation And Circle To Search

The event also featured notable announcements from Google. A preview of the new agentic version of Google Gemini was presented, demonstrating its capability to autonomously execute multi-step tasks, such as ordering food via Grubhub directly from a group chat. In addition, Google unveiled an updated “Circle to Search” feature, harnessing multi-object recognition to instantly search for highlighted content on the display. These developments further blur the lines between hardware and AI, reinforcing the trend toward smarter, more integrated mobile ecosystems.

Integrated AI Ecosystem

Samsung continues to position AI as a central pillar of the Galaxy experience. The S26 series supports multiple assistants, including Bixby, Google Gemini, and Perplexity. The company said it plans deeper integration with Perplexity’s APIs to support functions such as search, note-taking, and task management. Galaxy AI features also include improved call screening and automatic call summaries aimed at simplifying communication management.

Samsung Galaxy Buds4 Series

Alongside the smartphones, Samsung introduced the Galaxy Buds4 and Buds4 Pro. The earbuds feature a redesigned shape with a flatter stem and improved dust and water resistance ratings. The Buds4 Pro include an 11mm woofer designed to increase speaker surface area and improve audio output, along with slightly longer battery life compared with the standard model. Pricing starts at $179 for the Buds4 and $250 for the Buds4 Pro.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter