Breaking news

Cyprus Women Face A 29% Pension Gap As Gender Inequality Persists In Retirement

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

February 26, 2026

Overview

New Eurostat data show that women aged 65 and older in Cyprus receive pensions that are, on average, 29% lower than those of men in 2024. The gap is wider than the EU average of 24.5%, highlighting persistent structural differences in retirement income.

EU Comparison And Data Insights

Across the European Union, the average pension gap between women and men stands at 24.5%. In Cyprus, the difference reaches 29%, placing the country above several peers, including Greece, where the gap is 23.8%.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Eurostat data also shows significant variation across member states. Malta (40.3%), the Netherlands (36.3%), and Austria (35.6%) record the largest average gaps, while Estonia (5.6%), Slovakia (8.4%), and Hungary (9.6%) report the smallest disparities.

Median Versus Average Figures

Alongside average data, Eurostat published pension gap figures based on median pension values, which reduce the impact of extreme outliers. At the EU level, the median gap reaches 24.9% in 2024, slightly above the average figure.

In Cyprus, the median gap stands at 26.7%. While lower than the country’s average gap, it remains above the overall EU level. Across the euro area, the median gap reaches 28.1%, with Greece recording 29.8%.

Luxembourg (43.3%), Spain (41.1%), and the Netherlands (39.6%) show the largest median disparities, while Estonia, Hungary, and Denmark report comparatively smaller gaps.

Diverging Patterns And Structural Implications

The data also reveals notable differences between average and median measurements. In Denmark, the average pension gap exceeds the median by 12.9 percentage points, with similar patterns seen in Belgium (11.0 points) and Hungary (9.2 points).

In contrast, Spain, Luxembourg, and Portugal show the opposite trend, where the median gap is higher than the average by 11.9, 10.6, and 6.5 percentage points respectively.

These differences suggest that pension inequality is shaped not only by overall income levels but also by how pension distributions are structured across populations, reflecting long-term employment and earnings patterns.

Conclusion

The latest data confirms that Cyprus remains above the EU average in terms of the gender pension gap. Differences in lifetime earnings, career interruptions, and employment structures continue to translate into unequal retirement outcomes.

For policymakers, understanding both average and median indicators will be essential when designing reforms aimed at reducing pension inequality and improving long-term financial security for retirees.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.