Breaking news

Cyprus Parliament Debates Auction Law Reform Ahead of Elections

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

February 23, 2026

Cypriot political parties are fast-tracking multiple legislative proposals aimed at reforming the legal framework governing property auctions, a measure positioned as a final step before the upcoming May elections. The proposals are slated for discussion in the Finance Committee on March 9, alongside other pending legislative items.

Accelerated Legislative Efforts

During the latest plenary session, additional proposals were tabled by the Democratic Rally, the Ecologists, and MPs, including Zacharia Koulias and Christos Orphanidis. The proposals address issues affecting lenders, borrowers and guarantors in mortgage-backed property cases. With parliament expected to dissolve before the elections, concerns remain over whether sufficient time will be available for detailed debate and agreement on a unified reform package.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Key Proposals Under Consideration

Four main proposals are currently under review:

DRA proposal introduces a temporary freeze on auctions of primary residences valued at up to €350,000 until the end of the year. Supporters argue the pause would give lawmakers time to close legal gaps without encouraging strategic defaults.
The first Ecologists proposal expands the authority of the Financial Commissioner to review complaints related to debt verification after borrowers receive initial auction notices.
The second Ecologists proposal sets a minimum sale price at 50% of market value if a property remains unsold six months after the first auction attempt.
The joint proposal by Koulias and Orphanidis requires lenders to exhaust the liquidation of secured assets before pursuing guarantors. If a mortgaged property is sold, guarantor liability would be limited to the capital amount stated in the guarantee agreement. The same rule would apply when judicial action is initiated against guarantors.

Legislative Calendar And Strategic Implications

The final parliamentary session, initially scheduled for April 2, has been moved to April 23 due to the Easter break. Political parties are pushing to finalize auction-related reforms before parliament dissolves, arguing that delays could leave borrowers without additional protections until the next legislative term begins in the fall.

Separate proposals focused on guarantor protections, submitted by DISY, DIPA, EDEK and independent MPs, form part of the broader legislative effort.

The outcome of the March discussions will determine whether lawmakers can agree on a consolidated reform package before the election period begins.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.