Breaking news

Cyprus Banks Face Lower Climate Risk Than European Peers

Overview Of Climate-Related Risk Exposure

Recent data from the European Banking Authority’s ESG risk dashboard shows that Cypriot banks continue to maintain lower exposure to climate-sensitive sectors compared with many European peers. In the second quarter of 2025, Cypriot institutions reported that 59% of their corporate exposure was linked to non-financial companies operating in climate-sensitive industries. This places Cyprus among the lower-risk countries in the European Union, below the EU average of roughly 62%.

Sector-Specific Exposure Analysis

A closer look at portfolio composition shows that real estate activities represent the largest share of exposure at 16.7%. Retail and wholesale trade, including vehicle repair, account for 16.4%, while industry, transport, storage and construction represent 11.1%, 9% and 7.5% respectively. The distribution reflects a diversified exposure profile across sectors, supporting a more balanced approach to risk management.

European Landscape And Comparative Risk Profiles

Across the European Union, exposure to climate-sensitive sectors remains a defining factor in corporate lending strategies. Countries such as Denmark at 81%, Finland at 80% and Estonia at 79% report significantly higher exposure levels, reflecting differences in economic structure and sector concentration. At the opposite end, Luxembourg at 13%, Slovakia at 27% and Malta at 41% show lower exposure, illustrating varying national risk profiles and market dynamics.

Regulatory Developments And Enhanced Data Quality

Aside from sector exposure metrics, regulatory actions continue to influence the landscape. The European Central Bank (ECB) recently imposed a fine of €7.6 million on Credit Agricole for non-compliance with supervisory decisions related to climate and environmental risks. Additionally, improvements in environmental data quality have emerged as banks record more robust energy-performance information on real estate-backed exposures. A decline of approximately 10 percentage points in the reliance on proxy indicators since December 2023 further reflects enhanced sustainability assessment and reporting frameworks.

Conclusion

The latest data highlights the growing importance of climate risk management within Europe’s banking sector. By maintaining relatively lower exposure to climate-sensitive industries, Cypriot banks demonstrate a more cautious risk profile at a time when environmental considerations are becoming increasingly central to financial regulation and long-term stability.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter