Breaking news

Global Regulatory Trends: Social Media Bans For Minors Signal A New Digital Frontier

Worldwide, governments are taking unprecedented measures to shield young people from identified risks in the digital space. Following Australia’s groundbreaking move, several nations are grappling with the challenges posed by social media on the mental and physical well‐being of minors.

Australia Sets The Benchmark

In December 2025, Australia became the first country to enforce a nationwide social media ban for children under 16. The regulation restricts access to major platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, YouTube, Reddit, Twitch and Kick. Messaging services such as WhatsApp and YouTube Kids are excluded from the policy. Authorities require companies to apply strong age-verification systems rather than self-reported data, with fines reaching up to AUD 49.5 million, or approximately USD 34.4 million, for violations.

Denmark’s Upcoming Legislation

Denmark is preparing legislation that would ban social media access for users under 15. Announced in November 2025, the initiative is backed by both governing and opposition parties and could become law by mid-2026. At the same time, the Ministry of Digital Affairs is developing a digital identity application that incorporates age-verification tools to support enforcement.

France’s Legislative Move

French lawmakers approved a bill in late January 2026 aimed at reducing excessive screen time by restricting social media access for children under 15. Supported by President Emmanuel Macron, the measure is awaiting final Senate deliberation before a concluding vote in the lower chamber.

Debate In Germany

Recent discussions among German conservative leaders, including Chancellor Friedrich Merz, have explored proposals to limit social media use for children under 16. However, resistance from center-left coalition partners suggests that achieving consensus on a full ban remains uncertain.

Greece’s Imminent Announcement

Reports from early February indicate that Greece is close to announcing restrictions on social media access for children under 15. As officials finalize the proposal, policymakers and industry representatives are closely monitoring the potential economic and social implications.

Malaysia’s Bold Proposal

In November 2025, the Malaysian government declared its intention to prohibit social media use for individuals under 16, with enforcement expected to begin within the year. The move reflects a broader global shift toward tighter digital regulation designed to safeguard younger audiences.

Slovenia’s Draft Legislation

Slovenia is drafting legislation that would restrict social media access for children under 15. Announced by the country’s deputy prime minister in early February, the proposal specifically targets high-engagement platforms such as TikTok, Snapchat and Instagram, where user-generated content dominates.

Spain’s Policy Initiative

Spain’s prime minister confirmed plans in early February to introduce a social media ban for minors under 16, subject to parliamentary approval. In parallel, the government is evaluating policies that could hold social media executives personally responsible for the spread of hate speech on their platforms, linking content moderation with executive accountability.

The United Kingdom’s Deliberation

The United Kingdom is reviewing the possibility of implementing restrictions on social media use for individuals under 16. The government has initiated a consultation process involving parents, young users and civil society organizations. Officials are also considering tighter controls on platform features such as endless scrolling, which researchers associate with compulsive behavior.

As these regulatory approaches continue to develop, the global debate remains active. Governments are weighing the responsibility to protect children against concerns related to privacy, digital rights and potential government overreach, shaping the future direction of social media policy worldwide.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter