Breaking news

Cyprus Economy Flourishes As Labor Market Redundancies Plummet

Robust Economic Growth And Shrinking Redundancies

The current upward trends in the Cypriot economy are manifesting strongly in the labor market. In 2025, redundancies were reduced by nearly 50% compared to 2024, a clear indicator of both robust economic performance and efficient workforce management. The reduction in redundant employment figures is complemented by a significant 54.7% decrease in the redundancy compensation disbursed by the state in the same period, underscoring notable fiscal prudence.

Employment Rates And Fiscal Health

Labor market data show near-full employment, with the unemployment rate at 4.3% in December 2025. The decline in redundancies, combined with wage growth, has supported consumer spending and contributed to higher government revenues. Analysts link these developments to ongoing economic adjustments and structural reforms.

Comparative Analysis Of Redundancy Compensation

According to figures from the Ministry of Labor, 1,386 redundancy applications were approved in 2025 at a total cost of €15.7 million. This level is close to 2002, when the state paid €15.2 million. In previous years the figures were higher. In 2024, 2,509 employees received compensation totaling €28.7 million, while in 2023 the amount reached €27.8 million for 2,398 employees. Between 2020 and 2025, around 13,000 workers received redundancy payments amounting to €143 million in total.

Historical Perspective During Economic Downturns

During the economic crisis of 2013 and 2014, redundancy payouts reached their highest levels at €88.5 million and €99.5 million respectively, as business closures led to widespread job losses. The comparison highlights the shift from crisis conditions to the current period of relative stability.

Methodology Behind Redundancy Payments

The maximum individual redundancy payment in 2025 reached €64,489, up from €60,874 in 2024. Earlier years recorded lower maximum amounts, reflecting gradual wage increases. Under current legislation, the maximum entitlement is calculated using up to 75.5 weeks of compensation based on capped weekly earnings. Social Security rules also require at least 104 consecutive weeks of employment with the same employer, with compensation set at three weeks of pay for each full year of continuous service.

Conclusion

Recent data show a steady improvement in Cyprus’ labor market, with fewer redundancies, gradual wage growth and reduced state spending on compensation. If these trends continue, they are expected to support both business stability and household income levels.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter