Exclusive Analysis: Strategic Risks And Opportunities In Cyprus’ Casino Sector

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

February 4, 2026

Regional Revenue And Strategic Vulnerabilities

Cyprus’ casino industry currently attracts a significant portion of its revenue from key international markets including Israel, Cyprus, Lebanon, and the United Arab Emirates. During a detailed budget discussion before the Parliamentary Finance Committee, the Chairman of the National Gambling Commission, Pieris Chouridis, outlined emerging risks that could jeopardize the domestic casino landscape. He pointed out that the presence of sizable casino-resort operations in Greece, alongside establishments in occupied regions and in the UAE, could undermine the local market.

Comparative Market Dynamics

Chouridis highlighted the difference between the smaller Nicosia casino, which operates with a limited number of gaming tables, and the larger integrated resort in Limassol. He said this gap in scale and amenities may be encouraging some players to seek alternatives abroad or in less regulated markets. As a result, he supports plans to expand the Nicosia facility to make it more competitive.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Operational Limitations And Global Trends

Executive Director Haris Tsaggaridis added that the Nicosia casino’s limited size inherently restricts its ability to deliver a high-end experience. He noted that global trends within the casino industry are increasingly focused on offering exceptional customer experiences, a standard already met by the resort in Limassol and other international competitors.

Regulatory Initiatives And Social Responsibility

In addition to facility expansion, Chouridis discussed ongoing legislative endeavors aimed at reforming payout procedures in the industry. He underscored a robust analysis that juxtaposed the performance of casinos with that of resort enterprises, noting that the Commission’s mandate is to oversee traditional casino operations exclusively.

Addressing Gambling Addiction And Online Gaming Challenges

Chouridis also stressed the importance of programs addressing gambling addiction. He cited the Faros Center, which provides treatment and psychological support for individuals facing dependency issues. In addition, he raised concerns about the growth of illegal online gambling platforms that operate outside national regulation, often through mobile applications.

Cooperation with national gambling helplines and addiction support services remains a priority, aimed at protecting vulnerable groups while adapting to changes in the industry.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Breaking news