Breaking news

Cyprus Film Commission Launches Strategic London Roadshow to Champion Filming Incentives

Roadshow Overview

The Cyprus Film Commission recently orchestrated a three-day roadshow in London, targeting key professionals from the United Kingdom’s audiovisual sector. This high-level initiative underscored Cyprus’ ambition to position itself as a premier filming destination internationally.

Engaging the United Kingdom’s Audiovisual Community

Over the course of the event, two sessions were tailored specifically for British industry insiders, while the final day was exclusively devoted to Cypriots residing and working in the UK, hosted in collaboration with the Cypriot High Commission in London. Each session provided an in-depth presentation of Cyprus’ robust incentives programme, designed to attract both international and domestic screen productions.

Presenting Unparalleled Financial Incentives

Lefteris Eleftheriou, Chairman of the Cyprus Film Commission, led the series of events, outlining the financial advantages, practical production considerations, and eligibility criteria that define the country’s incentives scheme. Eleftheriou emphasized that the incentives programme offers one of the most generous and expeditious cash rebate payment systems in Europe, creating a competitive edge for producers.

Strong Industry Response and Strategic Growth

The response from British audiovisual professionals exceeded expectations, with particularly robust attendance at the session held at the High Commission. Established in 2017, the programme has grown in prominence, notably during the Covid-19 period, and now operates with an annual budget of €25 million, supporting more than seven international productions from the United Kingdom, France, Scandinavia, and beyond.

Fostering Domestic and International Collaboration

Central to Cyprus’ strategy is the collaboration between foreign productions and local entrepreneurs, a synergy that not only bolsters the domestic audiovisual industry but also enhances the country’s global reputation. The final session, co-organized with the Cypriots in the City business association, highlighted the critical role of the diaspora in shaping Cyprus’ economic and cultural landscape.

Looking Ahead

In his personal reflections on the roadshow, Eleftheriou noted that the concluding event—characterized by engaging discussions and thoughtful Q&A sessions—cemented Cyprus’ status as a forward-thinking destination for film and television production. This strategic initiative demonstrates the country’s commitment to fostering international partnerships and leveraging its competitive financial incentives to drive industry growth.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Aretilaw firm
Uol

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter