Breaking news

Cyprus Presidency Of The EU: Championing Consumer Rights And Digital Market Integrity

The Cyprus Presidency of the European Union is setting a clear agenda, with the European Consumer Organization (BEUC) playing a pivotal role in shaping the strategic landscape for consumer protection and economic fairness across member states. In a comprehensive 40‐page memorandum, BEUC has outlined targeted measures to promote consumer interests within the EU’s legislative and non‐legislative frameworks.

Setting The Strategic Agenda

BEUC’s document, titled “Cyprus Presidency Of The European Union – BEUC Priorities 2026,” delineates actionable initiatives and policy recommendations. The organization expects the Cyprus Presidency of the Council of the EU to facilitate the promotion and completion of measures that benefit consumers and address long-standing issues across multiple sectors, ensuring that legislative reform remains closely aligned with societal and economic needs.

Enhancing Passenger Rights And Service Standards

The memorandum outlines robust measures for reinforcing the rights of air passengers, emphasizing that compensation rights in cases of flight delays and cancellations should be preserved and not curtailed. BEUC advocates for innovative mechanisms such as automated refunds and harmonized enforcement authorities to ensure consumer claims are straightforward and effective. Moreover, it calls for stringent regulations on electronic booking intermediaries, extending beyond air travel to other transportation sectors, and demands that carry-on luggage be included at no extra cost in the base ticket price.

Ensuring A Fair And Transparent Digital Environment

In the digital domain, BEUC stresses the importance of a fair-by-design ecosystem that empowers consumers and safeguards them from deceptive practices. The recommendation for a one-click cancellation option for subscriptions exemplifies the need for simplicity without compromising consumer rights. The organization underlines that digital service providers must respect consumer privacy, particularly in an era where artificial intelligence and profitability pressures threaten to erode personal data protections.

Prioritizing Confidentiality And Data Protection

The memorandum insists on the confidentiality of electronic communications, arguing that broad legal grounds for data processing should be stringently limited. Any processing of communication data for statistical purposes must be accompanied by robust safeguards and restricted to public interest objectives. BEUC calls for both devices and software to be configured to ensure the highest possible privacy standards, with explicit consumer consent required for behavioral tracking.

Advancing High-Quality Digital Services And Infrastructure

Consumer access to high-quality, affordable internet services is deemed essential for full participation in a digital society and economy. The document argues for investment in broadband infrastructure that commensurately increases competition, maintains net neutrality, and avoids market distortion. Achieving connectivity ambitions for 2030 will also require targeted development in underserved and remote areas, placing particular emphasis on supporting vulnerable consumer groups.

Protecting Public Health And Consumer Safety In Cosmetics

The memorandum also addresses EU legislation on cosmetics, particularly the prohibition of carcinogenic, DNA-altering, or toxic substances. BEUC warns against any dilution of these standards, emphasizing that clear, reliable chemical labeling for consumers is vital for protecting both public health and the environment. Access to comprehensive product information will allow informed consumer choices well before the point of purchase.

Designing A Consumer-Centric Digital Euro

A forward-looking section of the document discusses the digital euro, advocating for a design centered on consumer interests and guided by public benefit rather than private banking motives. The digital currency should adhere to strict privacy norms, enable anonymous transactions within defined limits, and be accessible to all users free of charge. Additionally, mechanisms for fraud protection, such as chargeback processes, are recommended to ensure continued reliability and consumer trust alongside traditional cash options.

Strengthening Enforcement And Cross-Border Cooperation

Lastly, BEUC highlights the need for more robust enforcement mechanisms across member states. Relying solely on national authorities has proved inefficient. The European Commission should be empowered to lead cross-border investigations and impose sanctions when traders fail to comply with consumer protection commitments. Strengthening the independence and resource allocation of the Commission, including its data protection efforts, will help ensure that consumer rights are consistently upheld throughout the EU.

In sum, BEUC’s comprehensive roadmap provides clear directives that can help transform the EU’s consumer protection framework. By aligning legislative reforms with digital innovation and consumer-centric principles, the Cyprus Presidency has the opportunity to set enduring standards that benefit society as a whole.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

eCredo
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter