Breaking news

Cyprus Trade Deficit Widens In 2025 Amid Shifting Import And Export Dynamics

Overview Of Cyprus Trade Imbalance

In a revealing economic report, Cyprus experienced a significant widening of its trade deficit, reaching €7.28 billion during the first eleven months of 2025. The disparity is predominantly due to robust imports outpacing exports, as outlined in provisional data released by the Cyprus Statistical Service (Cystat).

Fluctuations In Import Activity

Data from November 2025 indicates that total imports of goods totaled €1.04 billion, marking a 10.6% decline when compared with €1.16 billion recorded in November 2024. Imports sourced from other EU member states were valued at €595.70 million, while goods originating from third countries amounted to €442.70 million—down from €657.50 million and €503.90 million respectively in the corresponding period of the previous year.

Notably, the transfer of economic ownership of vessels was a minor component of November imports, valued at €10.00 million as opposed to €138.70 million in the prior year, underscoring a shift in this niche segment of trade.

Export Growth And Regional Shifts

Despite the overall trade deficit, export activity showed positive momentum. In November 2025, total exports reached €407.10 million, a 6.3% increase over the €382.90 million reported in November 2024. Exports to EU member states were valued at €106.50 million, whereas exports to third countries were classified at €300.60 million—up from €83.10 million and €299.80 million respectively in the previous year.

In the context of vessel transfers, November exports included a €42.60 million transaction, down from €55.50 million a year earlier, indicating sector-specific challenges.

Annual Trade Performance And Sector Analysis

For the period spanning January to November 2025, Cyprus recorded total goods imports of €12.31 billion, reflecting a 9.9% year-on-year increase from €11.20 billion. Simultaneously, total exports for the period rose to €5.03 billion, a 4.5% increase from €4.81 billion in the corresponding period of 2024. Consequently, the overall trade deficit widened to €7.28 billion, compared with €6.39 billion in 2024.

Monthly snapshots, such as the final data for October 2025, reveal that imports dropped 8.9% from €1.27 billion in October 2024 to €1.15 billion in October 2025. Meanwhile, exports of domestically produced products, which include essential items for ships and aircraft, slipped by 16.4% from €296.40 million to €247.70 million. Domestic industrial product exports also saw a decline, falling from €289.00 million to €238.70 million, whereas agricultural exports nudged upward from €6.10 million to €7.80 million. Additionally, exports of foreign products experienced a 4.7% decrease from €150.40 million to €143.30 million.

Sector-Specific Export Highlights

Among the principal exports of domestically produced goods—excluding stores and provisions for ships and aircraft—the leading categories for January to October 2025 were mineral fuels and oils, which stood at €2.00 billion, halloumi cheese at €309.70 million, and pharmaceutical products at €289.70 million. These figures underscore the varied and strategic nature of Cyprus’s export economy.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter