Government Allocates Over €57,000 to Support Professional Fishers

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

December 19, 2025

Targeted Interventions Bolster Coastal Economy

The Cabinet has authorized financial support totaling more than €57,000 for professional fishers, as part of three carefully targeted interventions led by the Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment. This initiative is designed to counteract external pressures that challenge the viability of commercial fishing, a sector integral to coastal communities and local economies.

Addressing Operational Challenges

According to the official ministry announcement, the financial assistance is intended to compensate for challenges such as restricted access to traditional fishing grounds caused by administrative limitations and NAVTEX maritime prohibitions. These constraints force fishers to venture to more distant areas, thereby incurring higher fuel expenses and suffering income losses.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Coping With Regulatory And Infrastructural Costs

In addition to operational hurdles, the support covers extra costs arising from the mandatory use of electronic logbook systems on fishing vessels. The measures also account for long-term impacts associated with the construction and operation of extensive energy infrastructures, such as the coastal fuel loading terminal in Vasiliko. This facility has significantly limited traditional fishing zones, particularly affecting anglers in the Zygi region.

A Strategic, Compensatory Approach

The interventions are structured as compensatory measures aimed at offsetting a portion of the financial burden faced by professional fishers. By alleviating these pressures, the government ensures the continued operation of the fishing industry under increasingly stringent regulatory and economic conditions.

Compliance With European And National Standards

All financial allowances are provided under the framework of both European and national support measures recognized for their significance, ensuring that all disbursements adhere to strict oversight and procedural requirements. The funds will be disbursed to eligible recipients before the end of the current year.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Breaking news