Breaking news

The New York Times Sues AI Startup Perplexity Over Copyright Infringement

Legal Showdown in the Digital Age

The New York Times has taken decisive legal action against AI search startup Perplexity, accusing the firm of copyright infringement. The suit, filed on Friday, marks the second legal challenge targeting an AI organization, joining similar efforts led by media powerhouses such as the Chicago Tribune and others.

Unlicensed Content and Commercial Products

The Times contends that Perplexity has exploited its copyrighted content by substituting original material in its commercial offerings—without permission or proper remuneration. According to the legal filing, the startup’s reliance on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) techniques, which gather and repackage information from websites and databases, results in outputs that closely mirror the original texts.

Negotiations, Licensing, And Industry Leverage

This litigation emerges amidst ongoing negotiations between media companies and AI firms. While some publishers, including The New York Times, have engaged in licensing agreements—such as the multi-year deal with Amazon—publishers are increasingly using lawsuits as leverage. They aim to force AI companies to enter formal licensing agreements that fairly compensate creators and preserve the economic sustainability of quality journalism.

Countermeasures and Industry Precedents

In response to mounting compensation demands, Perplexity introduced a Publishers’ Program last year. This initiative offers ad revenue sharing to prominent publications like Gannett, TIME, Fortune, and the Los Angeles Times. More recently, the company launched Comet Plus—allocating 80% of its monthly fee to participating publishers—and secured a significant multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images. Despite these measures, critics argue that platforms like Perplexity continue to undermine the value of original, paywalled journalism.

Industry Responses and Historic Battles

Graham James, a spokesperson for The New York Times, asserted, “While we believe in the ethical and responsible use of AI, we firmly object to Perplexity’s unlicensed use of our content. RAG allows Perplexity to crawl the internet and steal content from behind our paywall, which should remain exclusive to our subscribers.” Perplexity’s head of communications, Jesse Dwyer, responded by noting that legal challenges against disruptive technology have a longstanding history, from radio and television to the internet and social media.

Implications For The Future Of Copyright And AI

This lawsuit, following past legal actions against companies such as OpenAI and its backer Microsoft, underscores the escalating tension between traditional publishers and tech innovators. Court decisions—like the recent case against Anthropic for using pirated texts—suggest that the legal framework around fair use and content training may evolve significantly as AI technology pushes boundaries.

A Pivotal Moment In Media And Technology

By holding Perplexity accountable for its commercial practices, The New York Times seeks not only to recoup damages but also to set a precedent that ensures content creators receive due compensation. This legal maneuver is emblematic of a broader strategy by legacy publishers to secure the economic viability of their work in an era increasingly dominated by automated, AI-driven content generation.

Women Make Up A Majority Of The EU’s Science And Technology Workforce But The Real Gap Is Elsewhere

Women now make up the majority of the EU’s science and technology workforce. According to Eurostat, in 2025, more than 81.6 million people aged 15 to 74 were employed in science and technology occupations across the EU. Of those, 52.5% were women, equal to 42.8 million women. The number of women in these occupations rose by 27.9% compared with 2015, an increase of more than 9.3 million over a decade.

On the surface, the numbers resemble progress. However, Eurostat’s category requires context before that figure can be read accurately. The data refers to HRST, or Human Resources in Science and Technology, specifically people employed in science and technology occupations. These are roles where the main tasks require professional or technical knowledge in physical and life sciences, but also in social sciences and humanities. That definition is wider and broader than engineering, ICT, laboratory science, or high-tech research alone.

Zooming In

The gender picture changes once the data moves from a wider definition of the workforce to the narrower scientist-and-engineer (research and manufacturing) subgroup.

Scientists and engineers represented almost a quarter of all people employed in science and technology in the EU in 2025. Eurostat describes scientists and engineers as often being the innovators at the centre of technology-led development, making them an important subgroup to focus on separately.

Women accounted for only 40.8% of scientists and engineers in 2025, despite making up more than half of the wider category. That share has increased by a mere 0.5 percentage points over the past decade. The absolute number of women working as scientists and engineers rose from 5.3 million in 2015 to 8.2 million in 2025, despite the push from national and international organisations to increase the number of women in the field. Europe has expanded the number of women in science and technology occupations over ten years. However, that expansion has not extended equally into the scientist-and-engineer subgroup, where much of Europe’s research and innovation work is conducted.

In 2025, of the 39.4 million women aged 25 to 64 working in science and technology occupations in the EU, 35.5 million worked in service activities. Only 2.7 million worked in manufacturing. Women accounted for 57.5% of science and technology employment in services, but only 31.3% in manufacturing.

In 2025, the highest shares of women employed in science and technology occupations were recorded in Latvia at 62.4%, followed by Hungary’s Great Plain and North region at 61.1%, Estonia at 60.5%, Poland’s Central macroregion at 60.4%, and Lithuania at 60.3%. No EU country recorded a majority of women among science and technology workers in manufacturing.

Break-down

Eurostat’s figures measure employment in broad science and technology occupations. They do not show job security, pay levels, management roles, promotion rates, research leadership, or whether women are concentrated in junior or senior workplace positions.

The classification of “senior” also requires additional explanation. Eurostat reports that 45.9% of science and technology workers aged 25 to 64 in the EU were classified as “senior” HRST in 2025. In this dataset, “senior” refers to workers aged 45 to 64. It does not mean senior manager, senior researcher, team lead, or decision-maker.

A high female share in the wider Human Resource Science and Technology (HRST) category does not parallel equal representation across scientists, engineers, manufacturing roles, senior posts, pay, research funding, or decision-making. These figures also reflect the occupational mix inside each country or region, not only structural progress across all areas of science and technology.

The Case Of Cyprus

Eurostat data places Cyprus’s overall science and technology employment at 37.2% of the labour force in 2025, slightly above the EU-27 figure of 36.9%, and above Greece at 26.8%, Malta at 33.9%, and Turkey at 18.2%. This figure covers the total share of the labour force employed in science and technology across all genders.

Progress Or Work-in-Progress?

52.5% in the broad category. 40.8% among scientists and engineers. 31.3% in manufacturing. Europe’s gender gap in science and technology hasn’t closed yet, and there is still work to be done to encourage and support more women to enter the field, especially in research and manufacturing.

Let’s not wait another decade for another couple of percentage points of hope.

eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter