Although the debt repayment timeline has been smoothed to comfortable levels, the success of previous debt management strategies paves the way for their continuation in the 2026-2028 strategy. With the global economic landscape unsettled by geopolitical tensions, evolving U.S. tariff policies, and exposure to the risks posed by climate change, maintaining a balanced repayment schedule remains a strategic imperative.
Maintaining A Manageable Debt Profile
The forthcoming mid-term public debt management report for 2026-2028 outlines strategic actions designed to sustain a balanced debt repayment schedule and an optimal residual maturity profile, effectively mitigating the risk of refinancing. Although the issuance of European Medium Term Notes (EMTN) in minimum reference sizes—typically around €1 billion per issuance—can create concentrated repayment obligations for smaller issuers such as the Cypriot Republic, evidence shows that the state has been successfully refinancing these obligations at ease.
Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram
Flexibility Through Extended Maturity
A key objective is to maintain an average debt maturity of no less than eight years. This duration provides the state the flexibility to recalibrate its strategy when needed, ensuring that borrowing remains within acceptable risk parameters. Concentrating a high debt load within a mid-term horizon could undermine the strategic aims of public debt management, particularly in an era marked by geopolitical tensions, U.S. protectionist measures, and the growing threat of climate-related disruptions. Any escalation in regional conflicts—such as heightened tensions between Israel and Hamas—as well as prolongation of the Russia-Ukraine dispute, could prompt the European Central Bank and other major financial authorities to adjust their monetary policies, with potentially adverse economic, financial, and societal consequences.
Mitigating Interest-Rate Volatility
The report further addresses interest rate fluctuations by setting a target to limit the share of variable-rate debt to no more than 35% of total annual borrowing for 2026, and 30% for 2027-2028. This cautious allocation is aimed at minimizing the volatility of annual interest expenses and strengthening forecast reliability for public finances, thereby preserving the state’s liquidity.
Strategic Borrowing In An Environment of Uncertainty
While recent years have seen the state secure variable-rate loans for infrastructure initiatives, prevailing high interest rates and the potential for further short-term increases have underscored the priority of fixed-rate financing within the current strategy. Should interest rates remain at current levels—contingent upon the smooth execution of the U.S. government’s plan without Middle Eastern escalations or additional negative shocks—fixed-rate borrowing continues to be the preferred option. Ultimately, the choice of borrowing instrument will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to ensure optimal financing for infrastructure projects.
