Breaking news

Japanese Capital Ignites European Deep Tech Boom

Japanese investors are increasingly directing their substantial capital toward Europe’s burgeoning deep tech ecosystem. As risk-averse Japanese corporates seek stable growth beyond their own maturing market, they are fueling a dramatic transformation within Europe’s venture capital landscape.

New Investment Horizons Beyond Silicon Valley

Historically overshadowed by Silicon Valley, Europe’s startup scene has emerged as an attractive destination for Japanese funds. Since the inception of the EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement in 2019, Japanese-linked investors have actively participated in financing rounds totaling over 33 billion euros, compared to 5.3 billion euros in the preceding five years. This renewed focus underscores a strategic pivot away from traditional U.S. tech hubs, as investors such as Softbank and others leverage Europe’s mature entrepreneurial ecosystem.

Deep Tech And Industrial Expertise As Catalysts

Japanese capital has been particularly drawn to the deep tech sector, where companies pioneer innovations in science and engineering. In 2024, deep tech and artificial intelligence made up 70% of deals with Japanese participation. Prominent examples include the U.K.-based autonomous vehicle startup Wayve, British quantum computing firm Quantinuum, and Spanish quantum venture Multiverse Computing. These investments not only provide essential growth capital but also bring critical industrial experience to scale large manufacturing projects—a gap that Europe has long struggled to bridge.

A Strategic Blend Of Capital And Know‐How

Industry leaders such as Mitsubishi, Sanden, Yamato Holdings, and Toyota are directly backing European tech ventures. Their robust manufacturing expertise and longstanding industrial prowess are instrumental in complementing Europe’s innovative but under-scaled ecosystem. As noted by Tomosaku Sohara, co-founder and Managing Partner of Japan-Europe VC NordicNinja (NordicNinja), many European entrepreneurs come from large corporates and possess a blend of corporate experience and entrepreneurial drive—a stark contrast to the younger, less experienced founders in Japan.

Bridging Cultures And Navigating Challenges

Despite these promising developments, cultural and linguistic differences remain a consideration. Japanese investors, known for their meticulous due diligence and consensus-driven decision-making, often approach partnerships with a measured pace. Sarah Fleischer, co-founder and CEO of Tozero (Tozero), emphasizes that the careful, homework-driven process of Japanese firms helps build robust, long-term industrial partnerships even as it may slow decision-making.

Future Prospects And Geopolitical Implications

Looking ahead, both Japanese and European stakeholders anticipate further collaboration. Projections indicate that Japanese-linked investment in European rounds will reach 3 billion euros in 2025, even as global investors eye regions like the Middle East. Japanese firms are also leveraging their well-established supply chains and manufacturing capabilities to secure a strategic foothold in burgeoning sectors such as energy, artificial intelligence, and defense. This cross-continental synergy not only positions both regions for economic growth but also reflects a broader geopolitical strategy to expand global influence.

In an era marked by rapid technological innovation and shifting global power dynamics, the infusion of Japanese capital into Europe’s tech landscape heralds a new chapter in international investment. As these historic financial flows continue, both regions stand to gain from shared expertise, diversified risk, and an invigorated commitment to growth and innovation.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Uol
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter