Breaking news

Cyprus Chamber Of Commerce And Industry Seeks Strategic European Affairs Officer

The Cyprus Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Keve), the largest business organization in Cyprus, has opened applications for a full-time officer position within its European Affairs and Programmes Department. Based at its central offices in Nicosia, this role is pivotal in driving the execution of European-funded projects and initiatives, leveraging Keve’s expansive network of over 9,000 member companies and 161 professional associations.

Key Responsibilities

The selected candidate will coordinate Keve’s participation in approved European projects while ensuring full compliance with EU regulations and project deadlines. Responsibilities include the preparation of detailed reports, deliverables, and various project documents alongside tasks such as conducting surveys, focus groups, interviews, and organizing workshops. The role further involves managing communication channels with European partners, institutions, and stakeholders, as well as spearheading dissemination activities that include drafting press releases and curating content for social media.

Candidate Profile And Requirements

Applicants must hold a university degree in European Studies, Business Administration, Economics, Political Science, International Relations, Environmental Sciences, or a related field. Postgraduate qualifications will be considered an added asset. A minimum of one year’s experience in implementing European (co-)funded projects is required, along with proven expertise in stakeholder engagement, event organization, and collaboration with EU institutions. Additional advantages include familiarity with project budget monitoring, financial reporting, and proposal drafting. Fluency in Greek and English, excellent report writing capabilities, and strong computer skills—including proficiency in MS Office and social media management—are essential. The ideal candidate will exhibit the ability to manage multiple priorities under tight deadlines and demonstrate robust public speaking and presentation skills.

Application Process

The role offers a competitive remuneration package that includes a provident fund and a 13th salary, commensurate with experience and qualifications. Candidates interested in pursuing this strategic opportunity should submit their curriculum vitae and cover letter by Monday, November 17, 2025, to the chamber’s human resources department. For further details, please visit the official job vacancy page.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter