Breaking news

Cyprus Lending Surge In September 2025 Highlights Robust Market Expansion

Robust Increase In New Loans

New loan figures reported for Cyprus in September 2025 reached an impressive €447.9 million, up from €245.5 million in August, according to data from the Central Bank of Cyprus. This significant rise underscores a pronounced boost in lending activity, predominantly geared toward business financing.

Segment-Specific Growth And Dynamics

The detailed statistics reveal that net new loans to non-financial companies totaled €309.4 million. Within this segment, loans up to €1 million accounted for €62.7 million, while larger loans exceeding €1 million reached €246.7 million. Housing loans also witnessed a notable increase, climbing to €112.9 million from €96.3 million in the previous month. Meanwhile, consumer loans experienced a marginal upward adjustment, moving from €20.4 million in August to €21.2 million. Overall, the aggregate of new loans—including debt restructurings—soared to €770.5 million compared to €420.4 million the prior month.

Shifting Interest Rate Trends

Interest rate movements further illuminate current market dynamics. In the lending segment, consumer loan rates declined from 7.09% to 6.46%, while housing loan rates eased from 3.91% to 3.63%. Conversely, rates for small enterprises edged upward from 4.19% to 4.32%, and loans exceeding €1 million saw a reduction from 4.30% to 3.79%.

On the deposit front, the average fixed deposit interest rate for households experienced a slight increase from 1.08% to 1.10%, with non-financial companies recording an improvement from 1.15% to 1.24%.

Comparative Insights With The Eurozone

When benchmarked against other Eurozone member states, Cyprus’s loan interest rates remain closely aligned with the European average: household loans stand at 3.93% compared to 3.91%, and business loans are reported at 4.22% versus 3.80%. However, deposit interest rates in Cyprus remain substantially lower, with households earning just 0.78% compared to 1.74% across the Eurozone, and non-financial companies receiving 1.08% as opposed to 1.94%.

The evolving lending landscape in Cyprus reflects broader economic trends and underscores the resilience of the market, as financial institutions adjust to shifting demand and interest rate environments. These developments will be critical to watch as they continue to influence both business financing and consumer deposit markets in the region.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter