Breaking news

Professional Regulation To Transform Cyprus’s Land Development Sector

Industry Initiative For Enhanced Transparency

The Cyprus Property Developers Association is spearheading a significant change in the nation’s real estate market by proposing the official establishment and registration of the Land Development Entrepreneur profession. Representing roughly 80 percent of the market through its 50 members, the association has already submitted a formal proposal to the Ministry of Interior, setting the stage for a fundamentally restructured industry environment.

Structured Framework For Market Integrity

The proposed regulation aims to usher in a new era of transparency and accountability within Cyprus’s property development landscape. By instituting a comprehensive set of rules governing the practice, the proposal promises to clarify the roles and responsibilities of industry participants. The introduction of a Registration Council for real estate developers—led by a senior public official with relevant academic credentials—will ensure rigorous oversight designed to protect buyers and bolster market trust.

Robust Criteria And Accountability Measures

Developed in consultation with the Cyprus Scientific and Technical Chamber (Etek) and legal experts, the draft legislation lays out detailed entry criteria for the official Register of Registered Entrepreneurs. Prospective registrants must operate from a fully equipped office, collaborate with a recognized design and project supervision entity, and employ qualified professionals, such as civil engineers, architects, or valuers, who are members of Etek. An additional provision allows individuals with less experience to register on a probationary basis for up to three years, ensuring a balanced approach that nurtures new talent while maintaining high standards.

Strategic Benefits For Stakeholders

At its core, the proposal intends to fortify Cyprus’s real estate market by promoting transparency and minimising unfair practices. For the state, the implementation of a regulated framework not only enhances supervision but also mitigates risks associated with market ambiguity. Meanwhile, property buyers stand to benefit from the assurance that they are engaging with professionals who meet well-defined ethical and technical criteria—a move that is anticipated to significantly enhance consumer confidence and long-term market stability.

Government Endorsement And Future Outlook

Following a productive meeting in May 2025, Interior Minister Constantinos Ioannou has expressed support for the proposal. This backing is exemplified by the establishment of a dedicated working group, comprised of officers from the Department of Lands and Surveys alongside association representatives, tasked with refining and advancing the draft law. Once enacted, registration will become a mandatory requirement for all individuals and entities wishing to operate as land development entrepreneurs in Cyprus, thereby closing a critical regulatory gap and establishing a benchmark for industry excellence.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter