Breaking news

The Independent Social Support Agency, IFKS : Strategic Vision and Community Impact

Event Launch At The Presidential Mansion

Today, at an exclusive event held at the Presidential Mansion and attended by the President of the Republic, the Independent Social Support Agency (IFKS) outlined its comprehensive strategy and multifaceted goals. The announcement coincided with the opening of the application period for financial aid to students for the upcoming academic year.

Funding And Application Details

Applications for student support will commence on October 27 and remain open until November 17, 2025. This initiative is designed to secure equal educational opportunities, ensuring that no student is excluded from higher education due to socio-economic challenges.

Commitment To Equal Opportunity And Transparency

Filippa Karsera Christodoulid, President of the Agency, emphasized the pivotal role of the IFKS in leveling the educational playing field. She noted that with the support of dedicated sponsors and partners, 1,098 students were able to pursue their studies last year. Karsera Christodoulid remarked, “Some students would not have been able to start, or would have had to abandon their studies, and others work in parallel – our intervention prevents that.”

Ensuring Long-Term Sustainability And Accountability

In her address, the President of the Agency also underscored the importance of transparency, noting that all applications, sponsor details, and eligibility criteria are available on the official website at socialsupport.gov.cy. She stressed that long-term financial sustainability is crucial to meeting the growing demand, affirming the Agency’s commitment to supporting every child’s dream with comprehensive resources, benefiting families and the wider community alike.

A Decade Of Service And Expanded Support

This year marks the tenth consecutive year of the Agency’s service. Looking ahead to the 2025-2026 period, the IFKS will extend its support by including three new student groups in its aid program. These groups comprise graduates from the Georgios Markou School for the Deaf, graduates from the School for the Blind, and individuals resettled in the areas of Kormakitis and Rizokarpasu.

Financial Oversight And Strategic Partnerships

General Accountant Andreas Antoniadis, who oversees the fiscal management of the Agency, also addressed the gathering. Since 2015, over 4,100 students have benefited from more than 5.8 million euros in aid. The support is provided in the form of tuition fee contributions or partial rent payments, directly benefitting academic institutions and landlords. The Agency collaborates with top-tier educational establishments both in Cyprus and internationally, ensuring that students have access to recognized and certified fields of study. In cases where additional support is necessary, institutions follow the Agency’s recommendations to implement further accommodations.

For further details on the Agency’s initiatives, please refer to the project presentation.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Uol
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
Aretilaw firm
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter