Breaking news

Supermarket Price Comparison: An €87 Differential Highlights Value Discrepancies

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

September 30, 2025

Introduction

A recent analysis by the Cypriot Consumer Association has revealed a significant price differential of €87 between the most and least expensive supermarket chains. The study, based on 234 common products listed on e-kalathi, provides a detailed look at how key retail players compare on everyday items.

Study Methodology

The research was carried out on September 28, examining price points across leading supermarket chains including Sklavenitis, Athinainitis, Ioannidis, Metro, and Alpha Mega—all of which share a broad range of identical products. By systematically comparing 234 products and further dissecting several specific product categories, the study offers a clear snapshot of the current market landscape.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Key Findings by Category

The analysis indicates that Sklavenitis emerged as the most competitively priced chain. Overall, the 234 products averaged €930.60 at Sklavenitis compared to €1017.05 at Alpha Mega. Second in affordability, Athinainitis was priced at €958.91, closely followed by Ioannidis and Metro, which recorded values just above €1000.

Dairy And Processed Products

When examining 38 common items—including yogurts, cheeses, and similar offerings—Sklavenitis again led with an average cost of €106.82. Alpha Mega, however, was the priciest at €116.54, with Athinainitis, Ioannidis, and Metro falling between these benchmarks.

Beverages

The study further analyzed 36 non-alcoholic beverages, including soft drinks, coffee, water, and juices. Prices ranged from €121.02 at Sklavenitis to €132.67 at Alpha Mega, reinforcing the chain-wide trend of pricing variability.

Fresh Milk And Bakery Items

A comparison of 17 types of fresh milk revealed modest price differences, with Sklavenitis at €36.44 and Alpha Mega at €37.81. In the bakery category, based on 17 products, Sklavenitis and Athinainitis were nearly identical at €50.48 and €50.79, respectively, while Metro reached €55.05.

Personal Care Products

For 28 personal care items—ranging from shampoos to toilet paper—Sklavenitis maintained its cost leadership at €139.81, while Alpha Mega again topped the price scale at €157.77. The other chains displayed intermediate pricing, underscoring consistent market differentials.

Product Availability Trends

The study also noted a slight reduction in the overall number of products listed on e-kalathi in September, compared with August. Most chains experienced a small decline in product count, with the exception of Pop Life, which saw an increased inventory. This trend is indicative of broader inventory management practices within the sector.

Conclusion

The findings highlight not only a marked price disparity within the supermarket industry but also the importance of continued consumer oversight. The Cypriot Consumer Association has pledged to monitor price developments on e-kalathi with transparency and diligence, ensuring that consumers remain informed in an ever-evolving retail landscape.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.