Breaking news

AKEL Unveils Roadmap for Energy Security and Cost Reduction Amid Government Shortfalls

Critical Proposals to Secure Energy Supply and Reduce Costs

Stephanos Stefanos, General Secretary of AKEL, has laid out a comprehensive series of proposals aimed at bolstering energy security, ensuring an adequate electricity supply, and reducing energy costs. His remarks come as he leveled stern criticism against the government for delays and mismanagement in the execution of crucial projects.

Vulnerabilities in Key Infrastructure Projects

Stefanos highlighted the stagnation surrounding the Vasiliko project and the electricity interconnection with Greece, warning that these delays pose significant risks to national energy security. With Cyprus now paying the second highest electricity prices in Europe (when adjusted for purchasing power), consumers are feeling the financial strain. He also reminded that since 2018, citizens have collectively borne 1.3 billion euros in pollution fines.

Accountability and Oversight

Targeting high-level mismanagement, Stefanos specifically pointed to figures such as Anastasiadis and DISY for their roles in derailing the Termatiko Vasilikou project — a matter currently under investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. The call for accountability includes demands for a full investigation by the Anti-Corruption Authority and a return of over 67 million euros in misallocated funds.

Demand for Clear Feasibility Studies

On the issue of the electricity interconnection, the government was accused of providing inconsistent positions on key matters. Stefanos urged the authorities to conduct thorough cost–benefit analyses, technical evaluations, and consumer impact studies to determine the viability of the project.

Strategic Infrastructure Initiatives

AKEL’s proposals address several critical areas of energy development:

  • Electricity Interconnection: A call for a definitive assessment of the project’s sustainability for public finances and consumer impact.
  • Natural Gas for Power Generation: Emphasis on completing onshore infrastructure, clearing unresolved issues, and establishing a clear roadmap with defined milestones and deadlines. An inquiry into alleged scandals and mismanagement is also demanded.
  • Exploitation of Domestic Hydrocarbons: The need to clarify agreements with companies for transportation, liquefaction, and export to Egypt is underscored, with a phased approach to prioritize domestic consumption.

A Call for Strategic Energy Planning

AKEL advocates for a comprehensive, transparent energy strategy anchored in oversight, prevention, and realistic planning. To that end, the establishment of an Energy Policy Council—a platform where political parties, technocrats, and experts can deliberate before key decisions—was proposed.

Immediate Operational Priorities

In parallel with long-term planning, several immediate steps are recommended:

  1. Securing Electricity Adequacy: Expedite processes to fortify key production sites like Dekeleia, replace outdated and inefficient production units, complete network storage infrastructure, and diversify pricing strategies during periods of renewable surplus.
  2. Boosting Energy Efficiency: Invest in widespread energy upgrades focusing on public buildings, schools, low-to-middle income households, and small to medium enterprises. Additionally, secure reliable storage measures and transparent allocation of funds from pollution and transition funds.
  3. Strengthening the Electrical Grid: Realign priorities by promoting rooftop solar panels, regulating the unchecked expansion of large industrial parks—especially on agricultural land—and accelerating the development of a flexible, bidirectional smart grid complemented by enhanced storage solutions.
  4. Reducing Energy Costs: Implement a series of fiscal measures including the removal of green taxes, a permanent VAT reduction on electricity to 5%, elimination of double taxation on fuels, rapid integration of renewable energy sources into the power mix, taxation of renewable windfall profits to fund anti-energy poverty measures, reduced VAT rates for home energy upgrades and green investments, expanded financing for photovoltaic projects, and automatic inclusion in special tariffs.

Conclusion

With energy prices and security at the forefront of both public concern and policy debates, AKEL’s proposals provide a detailed blueprint for immediate reforms and long-term strategic planning. This roadmap underscores the urgent need for government accountability and a methodical, transparent approach to securing Cyprus’s energy future.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter