Cyprus Tax Compliance At Risk: Deadline Nears For 2024 Declarations

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

September 29, 2025

With the submission deadline for 2024 income tax declarations rapidly approaching, a significant number of Cyprus taxpayers remain non-compliant. Approximately 47,000 individuals have yet to fully execute their tax obligations, raising concerns as authorities enforce stringent filing protocols.

Overview Of Filing Compliance

Recent data from the Tax Department indicates that around 84% of taxpayers have definitively submitted their income declarations. In total, 269,737 taxpayers have completed the process—comprising 245,008 salaried individuals and 24,729 self-employed professionals. This marks a notable decrease compared to the 317,400 completed filings recorded in the previous tax year.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Analysis Of Submission Data

In addition to the definitive submissions, another 17,849 tax declarations—including 15,605 from salaried employees and 2,244 from the self-employed—are currently classified as provisional. Such provisional submissions imply that while the declarations have been processed, they have not yet been formally finalized. This classification leaves approximately 5,000 taxpayers vulnerable to a €100 fine should no corrective action be taken.

Strict Deadlines And Enforcement Measures

The final deadline for submission is set for Tuesday, September 30 at midnight, with no further extensions permitted. The Director of Taxation, Sotiris Markidis, has urged all taxpayers to adhere strictly to the established timelines. He emphasized that the five-month window provided has been ample for compliance. Taxpayers who submit their declarations after October will face statutory penalties, including the aforementioned €100 fine.

Implications Of Upcoming Tax Reforms

This filing period may represent the final instance for declarations based on the existing tax framework. Pending legislative reforms aim to overhaul the current system, with new regulations scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2026. These reforms will introduce significant changes, such as an increase in the tax-exempt threshold to €20,500 for all taxpayers and revised family-based tax relief measures. Enhancements include additional allowances for dependent children and special provisions for single-parent families. Taxpayers should note that these reforms will alter the landscape for the 2025 tax declarations.

In summary, as the deadline looms, both individual and business taxpayers must accelerate their compliance efforts to avoid penalties and adapt to an evolving tax environment.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Breaking news