Breaking news

Cyprus Labor Committee Demands Overhaul Of Child Benefit Legislation

Government Under Scrutiny Over Social Exclusions

The House Labor Committee has renewed its call for a comprehensive revision of the child benefit legislation, urging both the government and the Sub-Ministry of Welfare to reform the existing framework. This initiative follows concerns voiced by the Child Rights Protection Inspector, who highlighted key flaws in the current system. Specifically, the residency requirement confined to designated zones in the Republic of Cyprus is effectively excluding many families from receiving critical social benefits.

Inadequate Policies Under Fire

Committee Chair and AKEL MP Andreas Kavkaliás criticized the prevailing legal structure, asserting that it fosters social exclusion by denying families access to benefits closely tied to child welfare—ranging from tuition support to various service discounts. According to Kavkaliás, social policies should focus on the needs of children rather than penalizing families based on the duration of their residence in the country.

Pressure Mounts For Immediate Legislative Amendments

In a decisive move, members of the committee have pressed the government for swift and meaningful legislative changes. Lawmakers have also signaled their readiness to submit a formal legislative proposal should there be an inadequate official response.

Political Divides Emerge

Notably, dissent within the political spectrum has surfaced. ELAM MP Sotiris Ioannou argued that the current benefits system unfairly favors non-nationals such as foreigners and Turkish-Cypriots, cautioning that this approach could inflate costs and ultimately diminish the benefits available for Cypriot citizens. In response, his party is preparing to file a proposal that would limit benefits exclusively to Cypriot nationals.

Addressing Injustices For Returning Cypriots

Adding to the debate, MP Andreas Apostolou condemned what he described as a severe injustice against Cypriots repatriating from non-European nations. Apostolou has secured a meeting with officials from the benefit service and has committed to presenting a legislative proposal by October. His initiative aims to ensure that returning Cypriot families receive child benefit payments from the very first day of their arrival.

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter