Breaking news

Union Monitors Takeover Speculations at Cyprus Development Bank Amid Staff Concerns

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

September 3, 2025

Amid rising speculation about a potential change in ownership at the Cyprus Development Bank (CDB), the employee union Etyk has issued a firm statement warning against any disruptions that could jeopardize the institution’s stability and the rights of its workforce.

Union Oversight and Employee Security

Etyk has emphasized its commitment to closely monitor the evolving situation at CDB bank, stressing that the future of the institution and the security of its employees remain paramount. The union affirmed that any prospective acquisition must guarantee the full transfer of all current employees to the new owners, underscoring that protection of jobs and rights is non-negotiable.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Firm Stance Against Workplace Victimisation

In its circular, the union made it clear that it will not tolerate actions that could lead to the victimisation or exclusion of staff. Etyk warned that failure to secure these conditions would prompt a vigorous response aimed at defending the interests and rights of its members during any restructuring or change of ownership.

Acquisition Interests and Regulatory Oversight

The bank has been the subject of acquisition interest for several years. Notably, discussions with AstroBank and an Armenian banking institution recently collapsed despite advanced talks. Additionally, the potential for foreign investment remains high, though any change in ownership would require stringent approvals from both the Central Bank of Cyprus and, for qualified holdings, the European Central Bank.

Financial Performance and Future Prospects

CDB Bank’s financial results for 2024 reveal a challenging operating environment. Profit after tax fell by 41% to €4.09 million, and overall net income declined by 9% to €22.8 million amid rising interest expenses, which escalated by 192% to €6.2 million. Despite these hurdles, the bank maintained robust capital and liquidity metrics, with a Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of 22.25%, an overall Capital Ratio of 27.38%, and a Liquidity Coverage Ratio of 348% backed by a liquidity surplus of €277 million. Furthermore, customer deposits increased by 12% to €549 million, and lending activity surged with new loans rising 152% to €34 million.

Strategic Resilience and Asset Quality Initiatives

The bank is actively working on strengthening its balance sheet, enhancing asset quality, and investing in technological upgrades to boost efficiency and resilience. These measures reflect a broader strategic commitment to not only stabilize the institution but also to position it for future growth in a competitive market environment.

With acquisition interest continuing to swirl and the union taking an uncompromising stance on employee rights, the unfolding narrative at CDB Bank is one to watch. The coming months will be crucial as all parties negotiate the balance between financial restructuring and the welfare of the bank’s workforce.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.