Alpha Bank Cyprus Champions Educational Equality Through Nationwide Back-to-School Initiative

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

September 3, 2025

Corporate Social Responsibility At Its Finest

Alpha Bank Cyprus has once again reaffirmed its commitment to social responsibility by engaging in the nationwide “Back-to-School Initiative,” organized by the Pan-Cypriot Coordinating Council of Volunteering. Now in its 11th consecutive year, the campaign underscores the bank’s enduring pledge to create a positive social impact by ensuring that vulnerable children from disadvantaged backgrounds are well-equipped for a dignified start to the academic year.

Strategic Impact Through Corporate Citizenship

As a leading supporter in this initiative, Alpha Bank Cyprus offered redeemable gift vouchers for purchasing school supplies. This decisive support meets the immediate needs identified by NGOs and various social partners across Cyprus, while emphasizing the campaign’s powerful message: “Help A Child Start School With A Smile.”

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Empowering Future Generations

Education remains a strategic priority for Alpha Bank Cyprus. Committed to advancing equal access to education for all children, the bank’s Corporate Social Responsibility strategy focuses on initiatives that secure the essential resources for an effective and seamless start to students’ academic journeys.

A Legacy Of Social Cohesion

Through continued investment in initiatives that bolster social cohesion and drive progress, Alpha Bank Cyprus exemplifies a governance model predicated on accountability, mutual support, and pragmatic social investment. This approach not only empowers individuals but also fortifies the community at large.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Breaking news