Opens in a new tab

Breaking news

Y Combinator Challenges Apple’s App Store Practices in Landmark Legal Battle

Legal Context In The Spotlight

In a decisive move amid the ongoing legal battle between Apple and Epic Games, Y Combinator has submitted an amicus brief urging the court to reject Apple’s attempt to appeal. The brief criticizes the App Store’s fee structure—commonly known as the “Apple Tax”—which, according to the incubator, has long hampered startup innovation by imposing an undue financial burden on emerging companies.

Redefining The Developer Landscape

The dispute was set in motion in 2020 when Epic Games filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple, taking issue with a 30% fee on App Store transactions, including in-app purchases. Epic contended that this model not only obstructed fair competition but also prohibited developers from informing users about alternative payment methods. While initial judicial rulings mandated an end to Apple’s anti-steering policies, subsequent modifications—such as the introduction of a link program with a reduced fee—have sustained the controversy.

Y Combinator’s Strategic Intervention

Y Combinator, a prominent investor in tech startups including Epic Games, has now positioned itself as an advocate for greater market flexibility. In its filing, the firm argued that a 30% revenue share can be the critical difference between a startup that scales, hires new talent, and reinvests in innovation, and one that struggles to maintain financial viability. According to the brief, the current fee structure creates an insurmountable barrier to entry, stifling competition at its core.

Implications For The Broader Ecosystem

The potential reversal of Apple’s practices could redefine the investment landscape by enabling a new generation of transformative businesses to flourish without the mitigating weight of excessive fees. As the next phase of arguments looms on October 21, market observers anticipate a decision that could fundamentally alter digital commerce and tech investment strategies.

This case is not only about enforcing fair practices but also about recalibrating an ecosystem where innovation is not throttled by prohibitive operational costs.

Esports Must Put Children’s Rights Ahead Of Competitive Ambitions, Report Says

Competitive gaming can help children build skills, find community and pursue achievement. However, as esports grows, young players face health, psychological and online safety risks, often without consistent safeguards, according to a new report from Save the Children.

The report, Protecting Child Rights in Esports, estimates that up to 300 million children worldwide participate in esports. It calls on the industry to prioritise the rights set out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child over competitive ambitions.

Potential risks include disrupted sleep, musculoskeletal pain, anxiety, depression, sexism and online harassment. Intensive training can also leave less time for education, family and friends.

“Esports offers exciting opportunities for children, but participation should never come at the expense of their rights, wellbeing or development,” said Theo Toresson, a psychologist and gaming expert at Save the Children.

Children must be treated “as children first and competitors second”, he added, calling for their involvement in decisions that affect them.

Training Standards Remain Uneven

The report highlights the lack of widely established standards for training hours and methods. Extended periods of sitting, insufficient breaks and schedules that interfere with sleep, exercise and schoolwork can affect young players’ health and development.

Poor posture and long sessions may also cause neck, shoulder and wrist pain, while late-night gaming can undermine sleep, concentration and mood.

Although some organisations provide guidance on breaks, nutrition, sleep and hydration, a representative of a national esports federation told the report that this advice often draws on separate studies rather than a centralised set of guidelines.

The report also notes positive findings: many professional esports players report satisfactory levels of physical activity, and higher-ranking players often place greater emphasis on fitness.

Online Harassment Adds To Mental Health Risks

Gaming communities and livestreaming platforms can help young players build connections and public profiles, but they may also expose them to cyberbullying, discrimination and privacy violations.

An analysis cited in the report examined chatrooms across 302 gameplay segments involving the 20 most popular Twitch streamers. It found sexist language in 62% of streams, racist language in 37%, ableist language in 84% and violent language in 97%.

Some esports federations and teams require staff to receive mental health first-aid training, but the practice remains uncommon. Young competitors may also face public scrutiny through livestreams, interviews and social media before they have the support to manage it.

Safeguards Must Extend Beyond Gameplay

The report raises further concerns about unequal participation linked to gender, race, LGBTQIA+ identity and disability. It also highlights children’s limited involvement in decisions affecting them and the risk of economic exploitation by teams, agents or parents, particularly where contracts lack transparency.

Inadequate supervision at live events presents additional risks.

Save the Children argues that protecting young competitors requires more than advice on posture and screen breaks. Clear standards, responsible oversight and age-appropriate safeguards are needed to ensure esports supports children’s development rather than putting it at risk.

As competitive gaming expands, the industry faces growing pressure to make children’s rights and wellbeing part of its operating standards.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter