Cyprus Ports Authority Secures Prestigious ISO 9001:2015 Certification

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

August 18, 2025

The Cyprus Ports Authority (CPA) has achieved a significant milestone, successfully obtaining certification for its Ports Regulatory Affairs Management Department under the internationally recognized CYS EN ISO 9001:2015 standard. This commendation, granted by the Cyprus Certification Company (CCC) and validated by the International Certification Network (IQNET), underscores the authority’s global credibility and dedication to excellence.

Commitment To Quality And Transparency

The certification reaffirms the CPA’s unwavering commitment to quality, transparency, and continuous improvement. With a transparent framework that ensures adherence to international best practices, the CPA is setting a benchmark in port operations, safety standards, and regulatory compliance.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Strengthening Regulatory Leadership

As the principal regulatory and supervisory body within the port sector in Cyprus, the CPA leverages this achievement to reinforce its mission: ensuring that port activities are executed with the highest degree of professionalism and in strict alignment with global standards. This certification serves as tangible evidence of the organization’s enhanced operational integrity and dedication to the maritime community.

Investing In Continuous Improvement

Looking forward, the CPA remains committed to upgrading its regulatory tools and quality assurance practices. By investing strategically in these areas, the authority is poised to further fortify the trust of its partners while effectively meeting the evolving expectations of both professionals and society in the maritime sector.

ISO 9001:2015 Standard: A Global Benchmark

ISO 9001:2015 is the most widely adopted framework for Quality Management Systems (QMS) worldwide. Emphasizing risk-based thinking, leadership, and the continuous cycle of improvement through the Plan–Do–Check–Act model, this standard has set the foundation for over a million certified organizations globally. Certification, which follows an independent audit by an accredited body such as the CCC, is typically valid for three years, with mandatory annual surveillance audits to ensure ongoing compliance.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Copyright Law Struggles To Keep Up With AI Training

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.

Breaking news