Breaking news

Cyprus’s Strategic Tax Incentives Attract Global Talent

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

June 25, 2025

Cyprus has successfully leveraged tax incentives to attract both international experts and returning Cypriot professionals, generating €406.6 million in tax exemptions over three years. During the period from 2021 to 2023, a total of 25,277 employees relocated to the island, declaring salaries amounting to €1.31 billion and enjoying tax relief between 20% and 50% based on individual circumstances.

Overview Of A Bold Strategic Initiative

The tax breaks form a critical pillar of Cyprus’s broader strategy to entice high-caliber talent from across the globe. Under the auspices of the upcoming ‘Minds in Cyprus’ bill—currently under detailed review by the finance committee—this initiative aims to formalize and extend tax exemptions. The measure is designed to foster economic growth by attracting professionals through significant income deductions and fiscal relief.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

National And Sectoral Breakdown

Data presented to parliament reveal a distinct demographic spread among beneficiaries. Over 5,200 exemptions benefited Cypriot professionals, cumulatively saving €84.8 million on declared salaries of €263.6 million. However, the bulk of the incentive’s rewards have gone to foreign nationals, with Russian citizens at the forefront. Russian professionals received €156.9 million in exemptions from a total of €513.8 million in earnings, closely followed by Greek experts—2,825 employees securing €32.9 million in tax benefits—and other nationalities including Ukrainians, Belarusians, Israelis, British, Lebanese, Indians, Germans, Italians, and French.

Sectoral analysis further underscores the program’s wide-ranging impact. The information and communication technologies (ICT) sector, for example, accounted for 9,060 employees earning €450.2 million and benefiting from €136.4 million in tax exemptions. Scientific and technical fields, along with financial and insurance services, similarly reaped substantial fiscal advantages, contributing to the overall dynamism of Cyprus’s economic landscape. Additional sectors, from wholesale and retail trade to public administration and healthcare, also recorded meaningful benefits.

Policy Debate And Concerns Over Equity

While the fiscal incentives have been broadly welcomed, they have not been without controversy. During recent sessions of the house finance committee, concerns were raised regarding the unequal treatment of taxpayers. Critics, including representatives from the bar association, have cautioned that the policy might inadvertently promote a brain drain by encouraging local specialists to temporarily work abroad in order to capitalize on the exemptions. Despite these critiques, legal representatives defended the measures, asserting that the policy does not discriminate but rather aims to enhance the island’s competitiveness on the international stage.

As Cyprus continues to fine-tune its framework for attracting global talent, the ongoing discussions will play a pivotal role in determining how the benefits of these incentives are balanced against emerging challenges. The outcome will likely set a precedent for similar economies striving to merge fiscal policy with talent acquisition in a competitive global market.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.