Breaking news

Cypriot Banks Excel in EU Profitability and Capital Adequacy Rankings

by THEFUTURE.TEAM

June 24, 2025

Impressive Profitability Figures

Cypriot banks have emerged as standout performers within the European Union, recording one of the nation’s highest profit margins and capital adequacy ratios by the end of 2024, according to the European Central Bank. At a return on equity (RoE) of 17.7%, Cyprus stands third in the EU – a notable increase from 14.7% in the third quarter of 2024, although slightly below the 21.9% reached at the end of 2023.

Comparative European Performance

The comparative landscape within the EU illustrates robust competition, with Romania topping the profitability charts at a RoE of 21.9%, rising from 18.0% the previous quarter. Hungary secured second place with a 19.7% return, reflecting significant improvements over the previous quarter. In contrast, the EU average hovered at 9.3%, while the euro area reported an average of 8.9% by year-end 2024.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Capital Adequacy and Resilience

Beyond profitability, Cypriot banks have demonstrated considerable capital strength. The common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratio, a critical indicator of capitalization relative to risk-weighted assets, was reported at 20.1% at the close of 2024 – ranking Cyprus fifth among EU member states, and notably above the EU average of 16.3%. This robust capital buffer is a key safeguard against credit risks and reinforces investor confidence.

Declining Non-performing Loans

Once a glaring vulnerability post the 2013 financial crisis, non-performing loans (NPLs) in Cyprus have seen a marked decline, dropping to 1.6% by December 2024. This improvement, set against a modest increase in the broader EU NPL ratio, underscores the effectiveness of strategic restructurings, enhanced regulatory oversight, and improved risk management practices.

Sector Transformation and Future Outlook

Wim Mijs, Director General of the European Banking Federation, has highlighted the remarkable transformation of Cyprus’ financial institutions since the 2013 crisis. With banks now more resilient and aligned with global best practices, the sector is well-equipped to navigate future economic headwinds, notwithstanding global uncertainties such as geopolitical tensions and monetary policy adjustments. The positive trends reported by the ECB, encompassing over 1,000 euro area banks, reinforce the broader narrative of a resilient banking environment driven by higher interest income and controlled credit risks.

Conclusion

The impressive performance of Cypriot banks, evidenced by superior profitability, robust capital adequacy, and declining NPLs, represents a significant turnaround story. These developments not only validate the structural reforms implemented over the past decade but also position Cyprus as a model of resilience amidst the competitive European financial landscape.

The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

by News Editor

August 24, 2026

Courts Are Still Applying Old Copyright Rules To AI

AI companies train models on enormous amounts of published material, including books, articles and academic research. Whether using that content without authors’ permission violates copyright law remains unresolved.

Much of the debate centres on fair use, which allows copyrighted material to be used without permission in certain circumstances. Courts consider factors such as the purpose of the use, how much material was involved and its impact on the original market.

Follow THE FUTURE on LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X and Telegram

Anthropic Case Sets An Important Precedent

A major case involving Anthropic and a group of authors provided one of the clearest rulings so far. Judge William Alsup found that using copyrighted books to train AI models was lawful, comparing the process to people reading and studying literature before creating something new.

Anthropic was nevertheless ordered to pay $1.5 billion in a settlement. The penalty concerned books the company had obtained from illegal online libraries rather than the AI training itself.

For AI companies, that distinction could prove significant because it separates studying copyrighted material from directly copying it.

Competition Could Be The Key Issue

A case involving Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence offers a different perspective. A court ruled that Ross could not claim fair use after using Reuters’ copyrighted material to develop a competing AI-powered legal research platform.

The decision suggests courts may be less willing to consider AI training fair use when copyrighted content is used to build a product that directly competes with the original.

For authors, an unresolved question is whether AI-generated content should be considered competition for the works used to train these models.

The Law Has Yet To Catch Up

US copyright law predates generative AI by decades, leaving courts to apply old principles to new technology. Questions also remain over copyright protection for AI-generated works. In Thaler v. Perlmutter, a court ruled that material created entirely by AI cannot receive copyright protection.

Major AI companies remain involved in copyright litigation, and different courts could reach different conclusions. For now, there is no universal rule: the legality of AI training will depend on the circumstances of each case and how courts ultimately interpret copyright and fair use.