Breaking news

23andMe Files For Chapter 11: Anne Wojcicki Resigns Amid Struggles to Revive Company

In a bold and unexpected move, 23andMe has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, signaling the company’s struggle to stay afloat amid mounting financial pressure. In its filing with the Eastern District of Missouri federal bankruptcy court, the DNA testing giant revealed it has initiated the process of selling its assets in an attempt to salvage what’s left of its business. Despite the looming uncertainty, 23andMe reassured customers that it would continue operations throughout the asset sale process, emphasizing that there would be no disruptions to how customer data is stored, managed, or protected.

If the bankruptcy court approves its Chapter 11 plan, 23andMe will embark on a 45-day window to solicit bids. If multiple buyers emerge, the company will hold an auction to maximize its value. A key condition for any potential buyer: they must adhere to legal requirements for handling customer data, a significant concern after recent breaches.

In a related shakeup, co-founder Anne Wojcicki, who once helmed the company, has stepped down as CEO. However, Wojcicki isn’t entirely distancing herself from the company—she will remain on 23andMe’s board and is reportedly preparing to bid on the company’s assets herself. Her resignation follows a failed attempt to take 23andMe private. Last month, she made a bid to acquire the company for $2.53 per share, but the deal collapsed when her partner, New Mountain Capital, pulled out. This was followed by a new bid this month, offering just 41 cents per share—a move swiftly rejected by the company’s board. In a statement on X (formerly Twitter), Wojcicki expressed her disappointment, but also her intent to pursue the company’s assets independently, citing her resignation as a strategic move to position herself better for the bidding process.

The Rise And Fall Of 23andMe

Once a market darling, 23andMe went public in 2021 through a merger with a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC), reaching a market cap of $6 billion. Wojcicki, a co-founder of the company, saw her fortune soar into the billions. But since then, the company’s stock has plummeted by over 99%, as it failed to reach profitability despite its promising start.

Adding fuel to the fire, the company suffered a major data breach in 2023, when hackers exploited recycled passwords to access sensitive user data. The breach involved over a million genetic data points, including information from high-profile individuals, and was shared across hacker forums. The exposed data included genetic ancestry, birth years, and even personal details of well-known tech figures such as Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. In the aftermath, 23andMe settled in court, agreeing to pay $30 million and offer three years of security monitoring to those affected by the breach.

As 23andMe enters its next phase under bankruptcy proceedings, the company faces a steep uphill battle to regain trust and value. The fate of its assets—and its brand—now rests in the hands of potential buyers.

Meta’s $18 Billion Settlement Limits State Claims Over Children’s Data

Meta’s $18 billion settlement with attorneys general from 29 U.S. states includes a provision limiting future state claims over the company’s use of children’s data for age-assurance systems.

Under the agreement, Meta must develop, train and begin testing a system to identify users under 13 within a year of the settlement taking effect. The company already uses AI-based age-detection tools, although the agreement does not require the new system to use AI.

States Agree To Limits On Future Claims

The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) generally restricts the collection and retention of personal data from children under 13. Under the settlement, the 29 state attorneys general agreed not to bring past, present or future claims under COPPA or similar state laws over the specified use of children’s data.

Meta will not be permitted to use information from users under 13 for advertising, marketing or algorithmic optimisation.

Federal Enforcement Remains Unclear

COPPA is primarily enforced by the Federal Trade Commission, which is not a party to the agreement. That leaves open the possibility of separate federal action over how Meta collects or uses children’s data.

Another issue is whether Meta can keep age-assurance data isolated from its other systems. An independent auditor will monitor compliance, but the settlement does not fully specify what data Meta can retain for training, how long it can be stored or whether derived insights can be used elsewhere.

Legal Risks Remain

Joshua Wurtzel, a partner at Schlam Stone & Dolan, said states could still pursue claims if Meta uses the data outside the settlement’s limits. Such cases could depend on how those limits are interpreted.

Peter Jackson, a data and intellectual property attorney at Greenberg Glusker, said the provision could “disincentivize future enforcement actions.”

The agreement gives Meta greater legal certainty around using children’s data for age assurance, but questions remain over federal enforcement, data retention and secondary use.

Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties
eCredo

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter