Breaking news

2026 Investment Outlook: Redefining Capital Raising And The Evolution Of AI

Founders Must Prove Enduring Value

Top investors agree that the landscape for raising capital in 2026 has shifted significantly. Last year’s focus on visionary ideas has given way to a demand for battle-tested, sustainable business models. As James Norman of Black Ops VC explains, founders now need more than just market traction—they must demonstrate a robust, repeatable distribution advantage. Investors are scrutinizing elements like established sales engines and proprietary workflows, emphasizing sustainable growth over flashy demos.

Capital Markets: Raising the Bar

Morgan Blumberg of M13 notes that the funding bar is set to rise. In the competitive realm of early-stage AI and tech application software, mega seed rounds may become scarcer. Instead, investors are on the lookout for founders who can leverage unique distribution channels and show explosive momentum in Series A and B rounds. The narrative today focuses on achieving real revenue, establishing credibility, and projecting growth trajectories over the next 12 to 24 months.

Expanding Geographic Horizons

Allen Taylor of Endeavor Catalyst highlights that the best venture returns are now emerging outside Silicon Valley. Markets in Poland, Turkey, and Greece are witnessing transformative investments as founders globally—from Latin America to the Middle East—build companies that serve massive markets right from inception. This globalization of venture is redefining where innovation and growth are concentrated.

Driving Investment Themes and Emerging Opportunities

Investors are sharpening their focus on two key strategies: backing high-context founders with deep industry expertise and targeting legacy sectors ripe for AI disruption. For instance, James Norman emphasizes investing in founders with direct industry experience, who provide a competitive distribution advantage from day one. Meanwhile, Morgan Blumberg and others are targeting legacy markets and infrastructure elements such as healthcare systems and foundational AI model development. Dorothy Chang of Flybridge Capital adds that proving clear lines to ROI and cost efficiencies will be paramount for enterprise adoption.

The IPO Market Reawakens

On the topic of public offerings, investors are cautiously optimistic. According to Norman, the IPO market is poised to thaw not because conditions have suddenly improved, but because the private market is running out of alternatives. With companies needing liquidity and a clear mechanism to reset market expectations, the public markets are set to reclaim their role as the primary source of scale. Blumberg and Taylor anticipate that flagship offerings from tech giants such as Anthropic and OpenAI will reignite momentum, further diversifying the geography of global tech listings—extending even to regional exchanges like Saudi Arabia’s Tadawul.

Assessing the Venture Climate for 2026

Norman describes the coming year as a clearing event that will draw a definitive line between durable platforms and transient ventures. With institutional investors recalibrating their strategies, family offices are stepping in with direct mandates and active market play. Blumberg reinforces that, as AI accelerates the transformation of industries, only those with a compelling operational track record and exclusive access to differentiated deal flow will thrive. Taylor underscores that a more complete liquidity toolkit—encompassing M&A, secondaries, and IPOs—will support founders committed to long-term growth.

Beyond the Hype: The Future of AI

The investor discourse has evolved from merely admiring AI’s potential to demanding its application at scale. Norman articulates that the era of simply building models is fading and will be replaced by an era where AI is a core element in solving deep, domain-specific challenges. Investors now seek the founders who can harness AI to reengineer cost structures and unlock new efficiencies. Blumberg advises that, while AI remains hot, attention will shift from broad applications to specific, controlled use cases—balancing explosive growth with measured reliability.

Anticipating Unexpected Shifts

Looking to the unexpected, Norman predicts the subtle end of the “ChatGPT-first” startup era as companies migrate toward a multi-model approach. Investors such as Taylor foresee a renaissance in backing Ukrainian founders and anticipate unexpected public market successes from regions like Latin America and the Middle East. In the words of Chang and Bankiya, while AI will continue to dominate the narrative, the companies that succeed will be those that seamlessly integrate multiple models into a coherent, scalable strategy.

In conclusion, the investment landscape for 2026 is set to reward founders who combine deep industry expertise with innovative distribution strategies. As AI transitions from a buzzword to a foundational business tool, the winners will be those who marry technological advancement with practical, long-term scalability.

Women Make Up A Majority Of The EU’s Science And Technology Workforce But The Real Gap Is Elsewhere

Women now make up the majority of the EU’s science and technology workforce. According to Eurostat, in 2025, more than 81.6 million people aged 15 to 74 were employed in science and technology occupations across the EU. Of those, 52.5% were women, equal to 42.8 million women. The number of women in these occupations rose by 27.9% compared with 2015, an increase of more than 9.3 million over a decade.

On the surface, the numbers resemble progress. However, Eurostat’s category requires context before that figure can be read accurately. The data refers to HRST, or Human Resources in Science and Technology, specifically people employed in science and technology occupations. These are roles where the main tasks require professional or technical knowledge in physical and life sciences, but also in social sciences and humanities. That definition is wider and broader than engineering, ICT, laboratory science, or high-tech research alone.

Zooming In

The gender picture changes once the data moves from a wider definition of the workforce to the narrower scientist-and-engineer (research and manufacturing) subgroup.

Scientists and engineers represented almost a quarter of all people employed in science and technology in the EU in 2025. Eurostat describes scientists and engineers as often being the innovators at the centre of technology-led development, making them an important subgroup to focus on separately.

Women accounted for only 40.8% of scientists and engineers in 2025, despite making up more than half of the wider category. That share has increased by a mere 0.5 percentage points over the past decade. The absolute number of women working as scientists and engineers rose from 5.3 million in 2015 to 8.2 million in 2025, despite the push from national and international organisations to increase the number of women in the field. Europe has expanded the number of women in science and technology occupations over ten years. However, that expansion has not extended equally into the scientist-and-engineer subgroup, where much of Europe’s research and innovation work is conducted.

In 2025, of the 39.4 million women aged 25 to 64 working in science and technology occupations in the EU, 35.5 million worked in service activities. Only 2.7 million worked in manufacturing. Women accounted for 57.5% of science and technology employment in services, but only 31.3% in manufacturing.

In 2025, the highest shares of women employed in science and technology occupations were recorded in Latvia at 62.4%, followed by Hungary’s Great Plain and North region at 61.1%, Estonia at 60.5%, Poland’s Central macroregion at 60.4%, and Lithuania at 60.3%. No EU country recorded a majority of women among science and technology workers in manufacturing.

Break-down

Eurostat’s figures measure employment in broad science and technology occupations. They do not show job security, pay levels, management roles, promotion rates, research leadership, or whether women are concentrated in junior or senior workplace positions.

The classification of “senior” also requires additional explanation. Eurostat reports that 45.9% of science and technology workers aged 25 to 64 in the EU were classified as “senior” HRST in 2025. In this dataset, “senior” refers to workers aged 45 to 64. It does not mean senior manager, senior researcher, team lead, or decision-maker.

A high female share in the wider Human Resource Science and Technology (HRST) category does not parallel equal representation across scientists, engineers, manufacturing roles, senior posts, pay, research funding, or decision-making. These figures also reflect the occupational mix inside each country or region, not only structural progress across all areas of science and technology.

The Case Of Cyprus

Eurostat data places Cyprus’s overall science and technology employment at 37.2% of the labour force in 2025, slightly above the EU-27 figure of 36.9%, and above Greece at 26.8%, Malta at 33.9%, and Turkey at 18.2%. This figure covers the total share of the labour force employed in science and technology across all genders.

Progress Or Work-in-Progress?

52.5% in the broad category. 40.8% among scientists and engineers. 31.3% in manufacturing. Europe’s gender gap in science and technology hasn’t closed yet, and there is still work to be done to encourage and support more women to enter the field, especially in research and manufacturing.

Let’s not wait another decade for another couple of percentage points of hope.

eCredo
Uol
Aretilaw firm
The Future Forbes Realty Global Properties

Become a Speaker

Become a Speaker

Become a Partner

Subscribe for our weekly newsletter